this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
974 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
2924 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Happy birthday to Let's Encrypt !

Huge thanks to everyone involved in making HTTPS available to everyone for free !

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 0x01@lemmy.ml 152 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Man I love let's encrypt, remember how terrible ssl was before the project landed?

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 65 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Crazy times. Nowadays it's weird when a website doesn't have https. Back then it was pretty much big companies only. And the price of a wildcard certificate...

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except for neverssl.com

Triggering the launch of captive portals for public Wi-Fi users everywhere yayy

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That website says it will never use SSL, but it definitely just connected over https with a valid certificate when I went there.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's odd. Try httpforever.com instead.

[–] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nice yeah that site actively rejects https connections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 31 points 1 month ago

I did not have the money to pay the insane amounts these greedy for-profit certificate authorities asked, so I only remember the pain of trying to setup my self-signed root certificate on my several devices/browsers, and then being unable to recover my private key because I went over the top with securing it.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And if you remember, that this whole shebang was only started, because Snowden revealed that the NSA spied on all of us, it's getting much much darker.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

People behave as if having a green lock icon were enough to consider you're safe.

People behave as if there were not multiple cases of abuse of PKI.

People behave as if all those whistleblowing cases exposing widespread illegal activities by the state were not treated as normal, except those exposing them being chased and vilified.

What I'm trying to say is that we're past the stage where techno-optimism about the Internet made sense. They just say in the news that abusing you is good, and everybody just takes it.

[–] missphant@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always had to fill out multiple pages of forms to get those free 1 year "trial" certs from startssl.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Oh man, I forgot about startssl until just now. I definitely had a few of those certs. If you wanted something fancy like a wildcard cert back then, you were paying $$$

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

Remember they wanted like $75 for certs? The gall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

And it changed the Internet, for good and a lot.

[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

SSL Certs were so god awful before certbot that it’s hard to explain now that it’s so easy and free.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

Also fucking expensive

[–] somenonewho@feddit.org 40 points 1 month ago

Damn! That's definitely a "I'm old" moment for me. I still remember when I first heard about the concept and I remember setting it up the first time on a self hosted project (which seemed harder back then).

Awesome project!

[–] kaotic@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A client of mine pays for an SSL cert he doesn’t even use. I’ve told him before I moved him to Let’s Encrypt because I was able to automate the renew process. He decided he needed to continue paying for the SSL cert. I told him we are not using it, but he doesn’t believe me. So he continues to pay for it.

[–] pagenotfound@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love it when companies are too stubborn to update their costs despite the necessity changing over the years.

My previous employment kept buying microsoft office license keys despite us already moving to 365. They probably did it out of habit when buying new computers. Needless to say I have a cardstack of license keys at home lol. Granted it’s for Office 2013 but I don’t really need the latest version for basic document processing.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Private sector is more efficient my ass

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] __matthew__@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Lol I instinctively freaked out when I saw the post preview assuming it was going to be a post about a major data breach or exploit of some sort relating to Let's Encrypt.

I probably need more positivity in my life 😂

[–] fiendishplan@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I worked for a company we had 300 websites, the boss wanted to buy certs. I told him about Lets Encrypt. He loved the idea it saved us a bunch of money. I suggest we donate $100 to them. Hes says "NO F-ing way!".

[–] nek0d3r@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And my parents still buy SSL certs because that's just what they know 🤢

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My last cert renewal was $20 for 3 years. That's less than a dollar a month, not exactly breaking the bank.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JohnyRocket@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say on the website but on their anniversary day they are giving away unlimited ssl certs!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Let's Encrypt is amazing, but are there any equally trustworthy alternatives people could switch to if something bad happens to it?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They came up with the ACME protocol, so presumably somebody could. The real barrier to entry is the cost of getting into that certificate chain of trust. I have no idea why it's so difficult and expensive.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, it's difficult, as it should be, because if you control a certificate in the active chain of trust of browsers, you can hack pretty much anything you want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If it begins to enshitify, someone will quickly take up the helm. It's become so core now that someone like Cloudflare would just be like "We do this now."

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cloudflare sort of provides this now by being a MITM to secure your site between your server and the end user. But this requires you and your end user to trust Cloudflare.

And fwiw the ACME protocol is open so anyone can implement it. I believe even the ACME software that EFF sends out allows you to choose your server with some configuration.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Laser@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] laxe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Huge impact on a tiny budget - that’s extremely impressive. The world could be so much better without rent seeking parasites.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Just two months ago, a security team member dinged one of our services for using Lets Encrypt, as "it's not as secure as a traditional CA".

[–] bfg9k@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd love for them to explain how, if anything the short cert validity and constant re-checking of the domain seems more secure than traditional CAs

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd also argue that the fact that it's 100% automated and their software is open source makes it objectively more secure. On the issuing side, there's no room for human error, social engineering, etc.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's sad that these arguments are still being shared. It was the same arguments years ago from people that would just assume that a free cert was inherently unsafe.

[–] zerozaku@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can anyone fill me on this? Why is it so significant?

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

HTTPS certs used to be very expensive and technically complicated, making it out of reach for most smaller orgs. Let's Encrypt brought easy mass adoption and changed encryption availability on the web for everyone.

[–] dan@upvote.au 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They also made it a open protocol (the ACME protocol), so now there's a bunch of certificate providers that implement the same protocol and thus can work with the same client apps (Certbot, acme.sh, etc). I know Sectigo and GoDaddy support ACME at least. So even if you don't use Let's Encrypt, you can still benefit from their work.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is the free, easy way to get an SSL cert (plus automated renewals). Without it, maybe HTTPS wouldn't have been so omnipresent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Yay for their glorious, free trusted ssl certs. Love this project!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

Lots of people shitting on stories of people who buy certs.

You do still have to buy a cert if you want one for a .onion. Let's encrypt still doesn't support it :(

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 6 points 1 month ago

Underrated. Stuff rocks.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Sleeping too well lately? Consider this:

If LetsEncrypt were to suffer a few weeks outage, how much of the internet would break?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If you have a fully automated setup. Youll have 30 days to mitigate the fallout.

[–] digdilem@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It won't be that simple.

For starters, you're assuming t-zero response. It'll likely be a week before people worry enough that LE isn't returning before they act. Then they have to find someone else for, possibly, the hundreds or thousands of certs they are responsible for. Set up processes with them. Hope that this new provide is able to cope with the massive, MASSIVE surge in demand without falling over themselves.

And that's assuming your company knows all its certs. That they haven't changed staff and lost knowledge, or outsourced IT (in which case they provider is likely staggering under the weight of all their clients demanding instant attention) and all that goes with that. Automation is actually bad in this situation because people tend to forget how stuff was done until it breaks. It's very likely that many certs will simply expire because they were forgotten about and the first thing some companies knows is when customers start complaining.

LetsEncrypt is genuinely brilliant, but we've all added a massive single point of failure into our systems by adopting it.

(Yeah, I've written a few disaster plans in my time. Why do you ask?)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›