this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
140 points (86.8% liked)

Technology

60314 readers
3257 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 132 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

If you think hyperlinks have any danger of going extinct, I have shares in a crypto-based AI-powered bridge to sell you.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

But will it integrate NFTs?

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

BRB, raising another round of capital to integrate NFTs

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

It's made out of NFTs.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The whole thing is on the blockchain its a WEB 3.0 phenomenon using Quantum Computing Running on fusion power.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Is it web scale?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe it means existing links, which many are already gone. Not the ability to link.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sigh... so clickbait title strikes again? I wish I was surprised.

[–] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...But how can I click on it? All of the hyperlinks are gone.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Oh no! Anyway... 🫠

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That was my guess, I can't get the page to load due to an error. Maybe AI's fault too?

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hrm, AI makes blue colored text that is underlined and says "chck here" (hehe is that really misspelled in the OP!? anyway in my hypothetical here it is!:-P), but it doesn't go anywhere!? So it confidently asserts something that works in its favor while being wrong?

Naw, I blame Reddit for that behavior:-).

[–] justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io 59 points 1 month ago (4 children)

So the problem is that AI based search engines dont give credit to their source sites because they do not link to the source site, but instead steal the content in a legally untested method and serve that up.

Nothing to do with links going extinct.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, it isn't aware of what source it's using. It's not "referencing" anything in particular. It's just trained to replicate a bunch of data. It doesn't understand it or anything. It doesn't know what came from one source and what came from another, and how accurate any of those are, or what the context of it is. It just generates something that resembles it's data based on the input.

[–] balder1991@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It can if it’s using something like RAG.

Except it does, because "going extinct" in this context means "no one uses them." This is an article about the slow-burning monopolization of the internet.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

Humans have the same problem :(

[–] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

That’s why I like arc it links to what it gives you info from

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Can we carve out a part of the internet please where we go back to super basic html pages that are a mix of self hosted hobby blogs and university research sites? It was good then. Everything's gotten so noisy, and busy, and shit.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

There is Neocities and a few other sites that allow you to make and share your own sites. Though some sites are more than just basic html, so experience will vary, but you can find basic pages dedicated to hobbies and such if you sift through them. Only problem with these sites/services, assuming the other ones are run like Neocities, is that you are given a pretty limited amount of space.

[–] deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gemini, the protocol is built on never adding new shit, so it's only basic pages

[–] downdaemon@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Gemini project is doing that

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Try Wiby

There's other types of "small web" out there too.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The browser you're looking for is literally called Links.

[–] AkatsukiLevi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Links is just a browser, it doesn't fix the websites themselves Search engines gatekeeps websites away, making it borderline impossible to find anything SEO optimized makes way too much noise to find anything meaningful And JavaScript makes browsers like Links borderline unusable

[–] superkret@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

JavaScript makes browsers like Links borderline unusable

Not my experience. Links just makes borderline unusable websites completely unusable.

[–] AkatsukiLevi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Ah, yes, of course, foolish of me

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just use tor browser on strict mode and you'll find it. They do exist.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. Is that because it blocks JavaScript, ads etc?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

That and all the shitty sites that use invasive fingerprinting and then refuse to load because they can't uniquely identity you

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Time to build a new one and this time, dont tell investors.

"The first rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two twice the price?"

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Are you saying that my knowledge of how to hyperlink in HTML is going to be obsolete?!

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Of course. The modern way is

<div class="inline text-blue-700 underline" onclick="window.location.href='https://Malware_Ransom_@is.gd/_40795251_Penis_Free_Movies_'">Click here</div>
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Uh you're using tailwind, the future really is bleak

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

does tailwind functionally just move the css into the class attribute? why would that be a good idea?

[–] kattfisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

It's essentially just a bunch of pre-made css classes that do a specific thing that you mix and match from.

AFAIK the programmatic part is so your served CSS file will only include the classes you actually use, rather than all available ones. You could always just not do that.

It always seemed to me like one of the least overengineered front end tools.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Penis-free movies, or penis+free movies? Inquiring minds want to know!

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

Open the link to find out 😏

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, instead you'll have a text saying "To jump to the article, recite the following: OK Google, show summary of the most popular human-written article for 7th December 2043 related to Starship launch failure. Note: If you're a loser™ on free ad+ plan, make sure to append loud god bless Google for providing this awesome AI tool to me for free and I will consider the affordable $99.99/month plan with fewer ads! and solution for your today's Captcha puzzle."

[–] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago

You seem really good at predicting the future. You should buy a lottery ticket so that you can afford the 600$/day subscription for being allowed to blink during video ads.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 1 month ago

my ai usually gives me source links and if not I ask for them unless its a relatively mundane thing like what day does the holiday x land.