this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
74 points (95.1% liked)

Linux

48668 readers
602 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello, I'm looking for a new distro that aligns with my privacy preferences and offers a wide range of packages without requiring me to search for PPAs, similar to Manjaro. I've grown uneasy about Manjaro's decision to collect unique data like MAC addresses and disk serial numbers by default, even if it's for diagnostic purposes.

In light of this, I'd like to ask for your recommendations on a Linux distro that meets the following criteria:

  1. No opt-out telemetry: I'm looking for a distro that doesn't collect any unique data by default.
  2. Access to a wide range of packages: I prefer a distro that offers a vast repository of packages, so I don't have to search for PPAs or third-party repositories.
  3. User-friendly: I'm not a fan of complicated configurations or steep learning curves, so a distro with a user-friendly approach would be ideal.

I'm curious to hear any recommendations you might have. Thanks!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blxter@lemmy.zip 69 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I switched to EOS Endeavour OS. I don't think it has data collection

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't, and offers an even friendlier experience than Manjaro IMO

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Endeavour has been an amazing distro for me, noob Linuxer. I started on Ubuntu Cinnamon, then tried Mint, and ended here on Endeavour and I love it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Presi300@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

EndeavorOS. It's like manjaro but not bad.

[–] Rogers@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Came here to say the same. Such a great distro, and it'll be an easy switch from manjaro.

I've been running it with btrfs and it has been rock solid stability wise. If you go btrfs I recommend grub btrfs for easy boot time snapshots and btrfs-assistant in the aur if you want a GUI to manage btrfs maintenance.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 month ago

Use Arch Linux. There's a script called "archinstall" you can use after connecting to the internet, and it's basically a guided installer

[–] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you're already used to Arch-based systems, and enjoy the convenience of the AUR, what about EndeavourOS?

It's basically Arch with GUI install scripts, and a different wallpaper.

[–] eruchitanda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw one commenter suggested Arch itself. IMO it's even a better idea than EOS.

archinstall doesn't have GUI, but it has very nice TUI (like what you have when you use htop), and you could finish selecting the options in very few minutes.

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe I'm a dumbass and it's my fault, but I find that archinstall always has an issue when you run it. It's easier to install arch manually than run the and troubleshoot.

[–] MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago

Another vote for Endeavour OS here

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

EndeavourOS. I used Manjaro for 1.5 years before switching to EndeavourOS. (BTW before that I was also using Ubuntu for 13 years in row...) I couldn't be happier. It's closer to Archlinux and a bit more focused on terminal, but overall hassle free for me. Updates come quicker and not in batches like Manjaro did. Which means more often new versions of packages and no compatibility or other issues with AUR caused by Manjaro. What desktop environment did you use before? KDE is pretty good on EndeavourOS and what I would recommend.

  1. No opt-out or opt-in telemetry.
  2. Same package manager and repository from Archlinux.
  3. You have already experience with Manjaro and the Archlinux stuff, so going to a similar system like EndeavourOS makes sense. However its a bit more terminal oriented, with a few GUI related help.

Because of your prior experience with Manjaro, I think EndeavourOS is a good candidate you should have in mind.

[–] airikr@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

I second EndeavourOS. It's so good!

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there something like an easy migration script, which would take packages and settings from my current install?

Ok, settings are mostly in my home anyway
Packages I can generate a list, and the manuals throw out the Manjaro stuff

Hmm...I'm having a laptop and a workstation running Manjaro and I really would like to make the switch, but can't tolerate much downtime, because both are machines for my work

So I'm looking for something to quickly setup everything as I had, without the need to remember everything and do it manually...

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 2 points 1 month ago

You wouldn't be first who asks this. There are attempts and instructions how to do this, step by step. But I'm not confident enough to recommend any of those. Maybe they are outdated or your machine requires some setup which is not covered. I do not recommend doing this, but if you have no time to setup a new OS from scratch, then at least make a backup before attempting any of this.

I would ask those on the official EndeavourOS forum, which is active and helpful: https://forum.endeavouros.com/

[–] Aelis@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

EndeavourOS is a good choice. I hopped from Manjaro to Endeavor myself a few years ago, never had an issue since. It's the kind of distro you set up once and then it's all done, you can forget about it, so much so that I hope I won't have to install it on another machine soon..because I really don't remember much about what I did back then xD

[–] icogniito@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well if you don’t want plain arch I’d go with cachyos or just endeavouros

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

+1 for Cachy, its Arch with cheat codes for speed.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Hannah Montana Linux

[–] thepiguy@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you used manjaro before, then I will recommend endeavour. It is arch Linux (same as manjaro) with an installer. I found their support forums to be helpful as an arch user.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Switched from manjaro to endeavor. wholeheartedly recommend. Easy enough but still has arch experience. Yay is super easy and have only had a minor issue with 1 game specifically on an nvidia card.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago
[–] NewOldGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would point you towards EndeavourOS. It's pretty much just preconfigured Arch, so you get the same rolling release packages as Manjaro and retain access to the AUR. Its a solid project, IMO it does everything that Manjaro claims and fails to but properly

[–] eco_game@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

I really like Pop!_OS, AFAIK it doesn't have any telemetry. It's basically a Ubuntu fork but without the stupid Ubuntu stuff, and they're currently even working on their own Desktop Environment.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Fedora/Nobara.

[–] imogen_underscore@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

i found endeavor to be nicer than Manjaro but tbh I'm at the stage where i just recommend installing arch. it's gotten a lot easier. endeavor is also arch based though so I'd go with that if you want super easy install / extra stuff installed ootb

[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

openSUSE Tumbleweed has served me well for some time now. Maybe give it a look-see?

[–] FrostyPolicy@suppo.fi 5 points 1 month ago

Second this. Tumbleweed is a great distro. Nearly everything you'll need can be found in default repos. Then there are several endorsed (semi) official add-on repos, and if that fails there's always OBS (opi is your friend for searching those).

[–] markstos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This coverage provides an example of what is sent, and it includes neither MACs nor HDD serial numbers.

https://ostechnix.com/manjaro-data-donor/

[–] imperator@beehaw.org 5 points 1 month ago

Bazzite.gg

Upgrades didn't break your system. You can run Arch packages, AUR, flatpaks.

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 month ago

Is there any distro that automatically collect data? Every distro I've tried asked directly on install or at first boot

[–] tomsh@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

I think you are looking for a distribution with KDE and flatpak by default

[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

cachyos is user friendly and based on arch

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's not very stable though. It failed majorly in my case.

[–] penguin202124@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I agree. Whenever I use Arch or Arch-based distros they are always very unstable. That is fine if you like a learning curve, but if you don't (like OP) then they probably aren't for you.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wasn't talking about Arch based. I was talking about Cachy specifically. It's even more unstable. Good Arch based distros can be decent if you don't mind occasional troubleshooting. Also Arch is more stable than Windows.

[–] penguin202124@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

That's very true. However even still I don't think beginners should use distros which are unstable until they learn Linux a bit more.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Take the plunge into the Void.

[–] Sarcasmo220@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Let go your earthly tether Enter the Void empty, and become wind

[–] prunerye@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Garuda. It's even easier than Manjaro. The theming can be a bit much, though.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] CairhienBookworm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I've been very happy on Fedora. It's been reliable and has up to date software and kernels.

[–] yum13241@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Garuda Linux. It's like Manjaro, in fact some utilities are forked from it, but done right.

You can also try EndeavourOS.

If you're into immutable distros, try Bazzite.

[–] Lawn_and_disorder@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Peppermint OS, its what made me stop distrohopping . Debian based with extra on top, easy doesn't brake,

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I don't understand the concept. It's Debian with xfce and a custom theme. Why is that a distribution. Seems like a meta package would be enough.

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think maybe Fedora but probably less software available

[–] r3dw4re@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

If your fedora is compatible with ELF64 (which it is) then you have 99% of total Linux compatible software available to you. Linux is Linux.

[–] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Not at all with RPMFusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimitsoni18@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago
load more comments
view more: next ›