this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

57436 readers
4873 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jtb@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Suspending them before they have actually done anything wrong is a bit like a pre-crime.

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You don't let pedophiles babysit your kids, and you don't let Facebook federate with your social network.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not like "they" are some unknown quantity though, it's the Facebook people. It's not weird or unreasonable for people to not want the company that got fined literally a billion euros for data privacy violations just a couple of months ago to get involved in a thing they like

[–] jtb@feddit.uk -1 points 1 year ago

I'm not on Facebook but I know people who are, and they are just ordinary people who made a poor choice and didn't read the terms and conditions. It's all those people who you are excluding, not just Facebook employees.

[–] artisanrox@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

They already spread medical disinfo like wildfire, got someone who sold our state secrets to the highest bidder elected, and house sociopathic terrorists like libsoftiktok. That's enough.

[–] KazuyaDarklight@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still on the fence about that being a good thing. I'm kind of looking forward to being able to see Twitter style content from major companies but without ads via my Mastodon account.

[–] jared@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

that's the thing, I see all content from major companies as ads.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So Meta is up and running now on threads.net, news to me. Hell yeah, ban the crap out of them.

[–] paul@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the benefit of “banning the crap out of them?”

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is how the tried and true agenda goes using Meta's threads.net and the Fediverse as an example.

  • Meta's site gets wildly popular because of corporate backing
  • Meta's site does something on purpose to cause poor operability with the rest of the Fediverse
  • People not on Meta's site can no longer properly communicate with people on Meta's site, they go to Meta's site
  • The Fediverse gets fractured and nobody cares because everyone is on Meta's site
  • Meta's site is the sole survivor and the rest of the platform dies.
  • Meta enshitifies their site as corporations typically do (think Twitter)

So yeah, ban the shit out of them. The proper term is defederate them, but do it with extreme prejudice.