this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
263 points (98.9% liked)

Privacy

32456 readers
556 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of practical steps, which is nice to see in an article like this.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 18 points 1 month ago

That iphone drama might actually lead to proper interest from normie core?

[–] tekato@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I doubt somebody running from a government is taking their tips from wired.com

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I read through the whole list, and monero was the only decent privacy recomendation I could find. Everything else was US-hosted. A lot of it was just recommendations from Apple and Google on "privacy" services they offer.

No mention of syncthing, matrix, xmpp, even with sections dedicated to those categories.

[–] pinkystew@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I read that monero is different from other cryptocurrencies and makes it harder to identify the individual to/from whom a transaction in is sent

What is the difference and why do other cryptocurrencies not implement it?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

The core focus of early crypto was decentralization, not anonymity. Bitcoin is totally decentralized, but the entire premise is the blockchain contains a permanent irrefutable ledger of transactions. Basically everyone knows if Wallet A paid Wallet B. If you refill your wallet with anything remotely traceable, that means everyone knows YOU paid Wallet B, and similarly if wallet B has any ties to the real world, the lines are easy to connect.

That's not to say you can't use it anonymously, but that was not the intent and thus it does anonymity poorly.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Monero is built as a privacy first crypto. Essentially it's like cash in many ways. You spend it in the shop and nobody knows where the cash you're handing over came from. When you get your change at the till you know nothing about who had the cash before you that you just got handed. It's just money.

This is all handled by a bunch of very complex cryptography. If it comes to it there are ways to prove you sent the money etc but only you have that capability to decide to share.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stembolts@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're right, ha, I'm totally not.. they, I mean they are totally not! You got it guy! Everyone listen to this guy! I'd go as far as to say anyone reading this article is innocent of ALL crimes!

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

People commenting however...

Don't challenge me

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Too bad private email access is essentially dead. Any service not requiring another email or phone number to sign up gets quickly shut down. A casualty in the war on whistleblowers.

[–] uncrme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

email is never private, if its that sensitive it just shouldn't go on the internet

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Exactly; email is digital post cards and always has been.

Of course, that means I can encrypt a message and use someone else’s email account to send it :)

[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can sign up for Proton mail without providing email or phone number, as far as I recall.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Nope. Try doing it through a Tor node.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 month ago (15 children)
[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Not in my experience

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 month ago

anyone dunking on the article, this is pretty far away from a how-to-lilst; it's more of a "think about these things if you haven't up until now" and as such a net positive. wrong community for it, though.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I'm glad they mentioned Monero in the article, but sad that they mentioned it alongside Zcash since Zcash is not private by default and not many people opt into the privacy and Zcash has shown willingness to be bad to their users by helping exchanges. Primarily because they are run by the Electric Coin Company, which is registered in the United States, and therefore they have to obey the laws of the United States. So, Zcash is not a good option.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Switch phone service to VoIP, cancel cell service, all tracking capabilities is gone.

[–] G7dX5kWz9V2R@reddthat.com 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A lot of organizations now block VOIP numbers thanks to stringent KYC laws.

[–] Mettled@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is possible to get a real cell number from a big name carrier and then port the number to VoIP company to use VoIP service with an original cell number.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In a lot of places, cell carriers enforce KYC too though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe, but if anything bad happens to originate from that number, the port history is still visible and now they have a suspect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEVI@feddit.org 15 points 1 month ago

That's just wrong when you're dealing with the government

[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Iirc any cell phone is still capable of dialing 911(or equivalent) even without a sim. So id imagine carrier towers and gps could still find it. You'd basically have to keep the device in a ferriday bag. Which complicates actually using it.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago

That is correct. Any cell phone sold in the United States by law is supposed to be able to dial 911 no matter whether they have a SIM card inserted or not and no matter whether they have service on a SIM card or not and also no matter whether one specific carrier in your area has no signal it will use the others instead. You may be a Verizon customer, but if you dial 911 and an AT&T tower picks up the call first, the AT&T network will serve that call instead.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One clarification: carrier towers can still find a phone; GPS is passive; your phone locates itself in relation to the GPS satellites.

Most phones are also broadcasting WiFi MAC IDs and Bluetooth MACs, plus hardware and capability strings over Bluetooth. And then any apps you’ve got loaded may also be calling home with your location unless you have that disabled and rotate your ad ID regularly.

[edit] also worth pointing out that even if you turn a smartphone “off” it still pings the local cell towers with its IMEI regularly. Surprised me the first time I witnessed that.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You're just shifting trust though - may be good in some cases, but not universal. Aldo does nothing about the cell tower connections tracking the location.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›