this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
16 points (80.8% liked)

Privacy

32649 readers
497 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 67 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The terrible irony of a for-profit company using the Anarchist A. I hate it.

[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] Killercat103@slrpnk.net 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Whats with the Anarchist A? Is it anything more than reduce its meaning into an aesthetic?

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like it's a for profit company so take a guess...

[–] Killercat103@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

Can't remember

[–] M600@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It’s pretty new, I’d give it a few years before trusting it.

If I’m self hosting it, then I’ll just setup wireguard.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What's their MO?

New entrant into already saturated market?

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

They forgot.

[–] krnl386@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Well, they forked wireguard go… I say their seriousness will depend on:

  • how well they maintain their fork
  • whether or not they continue to offer their self-hosted tier

I’ve been burned too many times by startups who gathered up some initial money from investors and then went all corpo once the money dried up.

[–] brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The service seems kind of generic, maybe even worse than the other generic VPN services. No statements about what they log, whether they allow p2p, no mention of port forwarding, servers in only 5 countries which you may/may not want to VPN through, etc.

Not sure about the software, I guess they think it will be an improvement over OpenVPN/WireGuard which is debatable.

[–] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Looks like my telegram dealer has opened up a VPN provider startup, very weird aesthetics. Can’t say anything about the product though, I guess it’s good to have more competition in the market?

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm just being dumb and can't find it but...its a massive red flag for a VPN not to have a privacy policy.

[–] scorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like they

  • collect "depersonalized" data
  • they use hidden pixels for tracking
  • allow advertisers to gather info such as your IP address
[–] Trincapinones@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

That's a major red flag for a VPN

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So they share "depersonalized" data with advertisers.

They user hidden pixels to track you on their website.

And they allow advertisers to collect your IP address to send you personalized ads.

[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 months ago

looks good on paper. idk what's behind it