this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
239 points (96.5% liked)

News

23655 readers
3291 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Despite concerns over Donald Trump’s past mishandling of classified information, including an FBI raid at his home in 2022, the Biden Administration is preparing to grant him access to national security briefings as part of a standard presidential transition.

This approach aligns with tradition, although intelligence experts are apprehensive, given Trump’s history of allegedly revealing sensitive information, notably to Russian officials.

Trump’s team is negotiating terms for office space and transition protocols but previously delayed signing a formal agreement with the General Services Administration.

Some Trump advisers have proposed bypassing standard security clearance procedures for incoming staff.

all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 174 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Actually insane that he is going to get away with everything.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 95 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There was a small glimmer of hope until he won the election.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There supposed to be his sentencing on 26th, but after he won I doubt it will be anything.

Edit: after looking more into it, looks like he is appealing that president elect has the same rights to do any crime as president based not on Constitution or any law but on the DOJ memo.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Nothing will come of that sentencing. Not even a fine.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's still a small one with amendment 14, and the fact that the US military is already looking into how to refuse illegal orders.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If by small you mean 0.00000000000001%.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

I like your optimism.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago

That's what the majority of electors want, welcome to democracy!

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 92 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Last time they had to dumb down the briefings and draw pictures so the stupid fuck could follow along. This time they should just make them as highly technical as possible. Bore him to sleep for the security of the nation.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're talking as if the people giving the briefings aren't about to all be fired and replaced with MAGA loyalist sycophants.

[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

The thing about sycophants is that they don't tend to be very competent. I expect replacing people in crucial positions will be the start of the end for the US as a superpower.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 6 points 1 month ago

at least they will have no idea what they're doing.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make all reports 50 pages long, mostly context, and very little actual Intel. That way, anybody actually reading it can't pass it on. Gonna make a "didn't specifically asked, didn't tell" policy.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, all he's really looking for is the affirmation he never got from his father. Fill the classified briefings with quotes from people who love him. Leave the details out of it.

I remember reading that the people who wrote the briefings last time had to make sure his name appeared in any section they wanted him to read, otherwise he's just skip it.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/333788-nsc-official-include-trumps-name-as-often-as-possible-so-he-reads/

[–] ryan213@lemmy.ca 63 points 1 month ago

And so will some Russians.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 59 points 1 month ago

Just send everything straight to Moscow. It'll be more efficient.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

~~Trump~~ Putin Will Soon Get Classified Briefings Again

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

Oohh, Putin and Winnie Pooh must be sleeping with a smile now...

On a side note: zelenski should immediately stop giving the US us any security information

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He won't actually, like, listen to them. But he'll be in the room when they're happening. Sometimes. If he didn't decide to play golf instead.

[–] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Jesus at this point I just hope he does play golf every day.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Apparently, Putin too.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Save a step and FaceTime the briefings with Putin

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

~~Putin~~ ~~Xi~~ ~~Kim~~ ~~Orban~~ ~~Modi~~ ~~Salman~~ ~~Milei~~ Trump Will Soon Get Classified Briefings Again

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Never imagined that I’d end up hoping for a military coup.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm GLAD the people who told us Trump was going to be the FASCIST DOWNFALL of America are Happily giving him TOP SECRET INTELLIGENCE!

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What else should they do? End Democracy themselves?

The american voters gave Trump access to Top Secret Intelligence (again!), so this is on them (as is every fucked up thing Trump can and will do for the next four years or longer).

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our country was literally founded on the concept that what's morally right isn't always legal.

Every group in this country who has fought to gain equality with white men reinforced that concept.

Breaking the law in the name of freedom is part of the fabric of this country, if the people are willing to do so.

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I get your point and I'm not saying that everything lawful is inherently morally right. But we're not talking about challenging and improving laws here and there. The transition of power in a democracy must be honored, otherwise it's not a democracy anymore.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But we’re not talking about challenging and improving laws here and there.

Neither are we. We're talking about a man who wants to be a dictator and has said as much. We're talking about the political party backing him that has a complete disregard for the aspirational ideals this country was founded on- a secular government that ensures equality for all. We're talking about the greatest wealth inequality in the history of the country. We're talking about the looting of public services to continue to drive that inequality even higher. We're talking about the language of fear and hate being spread from a coordinated political party and media that is enriched by that language.

Transferring power to someone who wants to improve your country but wants to do so in a way you disagree with is fine. Giving power to someone who said he is going to break everything is not.

The transition of power in a democracy must be honored, otherwise it’s not a democracy anymore

And now the dilemma becomes clear: you either give up democracy to prevent a fascist takeover, or you give up democracy because the fascists have taken over. Either way you've lost it, the question is whether you want the hope of it returning once purging fascists is done, or whether you want concentration camps and minority rule?

Democracy does not work when the electorate is uneducated and heavily propagandized, exactly the way America is now. Prioritizing the concept of democracy over the rights of people who will be hurt by the people you're handing power to, makes you complicit.

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And now the dilemma becomes clear: you either give up democracy to prevent a fascist takeover, or you give up democracy because the fascists have taken over.

I don't think I agree. You haven't lost democracy yet and while "purging the facists" surely sounds nice, it's still a pipedream that most certainly would just result in civil war.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My argument is that the GOP is going to do what they say they're going to do, and your argument is that they aren't.

Frankly, I think you're being optimistic.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It sucks, but it's the right move. We need to be prepared for what the Trump team does, but we can't just say "we think you'll do evil, so we're not giving you power." That would actually give them all the power. They'd, as the people willed it, take power by force, and then there'd be no resistance. The military would be "in the right" siding with them.

The correct move, I'm fairly certain, is to give them power and prepare a resistance. Let them make their move and show their hand, then a resistance will be justified.

Ideally, we're wrong and he doesn't do what we expect. I don't suspect this will be the case, but we would be wrong to assume it isn't possible and to ignore the will of the people.

We need to ensure Trump isn't a martyr and is instead a symbol of what happens when you become a tyrant. If he's martyred then his movement lives on. If he becomes what we suspect he will then the people will ally against him and the military will be right in turning against him.

...then we have to win.

[–] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

The world is a more complex place than when he left. Better use the big box of 64 crayon colors. If you have to use hand puppets, don't forget to do the voices.

[–] Kraiden@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

Gonna need a bigger bathroom

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's how the job works...

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] tate@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 month ago

In the 1930s a large majority of the german people wanted Hitler to lead them. That didn't mean that the german jews or gays or the poles or anyone else deserved what happened to them.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

That meme doesn't make any sense in this posts context.