this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
120 points (91.7% liked)

Canada

7188 readers
325 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
120
A cautionary tale for Canada (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

An interesting article about the extreme right in the US and how they are not interested in governing or working for the people but are focused instead on tearing apart the US government, taking away rights and freedoms, and turning the country into a christofascist dictatorship with oligarchs in charge.

When we look at the now extreme Canadian right, with soaring food prices and housing prices and a failing healthcare system and faltering public education that is now focused on pronouns and hurting the most vulnerable Canadian children we cannot help but draw parallels. They don't have a platform other than TrUdEaU bAd, pronouns, drag queens, and we're going to fix everything, no we don't have a plan, no we can't tell you how, just trust us.

These people are focused on tearing apart the polices and services that make Canada among the best countries in the world to live in. Their base seethes with resentment about being made to feel ignorant, racist, and intolerance and that seething resentment is manipulated into fear, anger, and hatred toward those who make them feel bad about themselves.

We need to wake up and vote down this nonsense.

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does no one grammar check or edit articles before publishing anymore?

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Editors went out the door years ago to save money.

[–] antizero99@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you write this commentary? I lost count of the wrong words and other nonsense.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4 bad autocorrects and a couple of spelling mistakes. It's fixed now. Let me know if you still see something wrong.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man thats a lot of work. You should hire an editor!

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My wife corrects me on Facebook.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago
[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Oh, the comment? Yes, I wrote that. I was swyping on my phone and didn't proofread. I'll go back and do that now. Sorry.

[–] pbjamm@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Chatbot fail English? Thats unpossible.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Such a scene would have been unthinkable two decades ago when Republicans were effective at wielding power and pushing through laws relating to everything from foreign wars and domestic surveillance programmes to Medicare and the No Child Left Behind schools policy.

Republicans at the time such as Tara Setmayer, a former communications director who worked on Capitol Hill for seven years, believed the party needed to reach young voters, women and minorities to survive.

Critics say Gaetz is taking advantage of an era in which, instead of working their way up the ranks one committee at a time, politicians can build their brand, “go viral” and raise money by flaunting their extremism in the rightwing media ecosystem.

Rich Lowry, editor-in-chief of National Review magazine, wrote: “Republican backbenchers used to be people such as Jack Kemp and Paul Ryan, who became something by promoting ideas that they carefully developed, sincerely believed, and persuaded their colleagues to embrace.

Steve Scalise, the majority leader, and Jim Jordan, the judiciary committee chairman, are the two leading candidates to succeed McCarthy and frantically chasing endorsements ahead of a vote among Republicans expected on Tuesday.

Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, said: “We now see [that] the kind of authoritarian populism that talks about taking control, bringing order and strongman rule is an utter fiction.


The original article contains 1,348 words, the summary contains 231 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!