this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)

Europe

1419 readers
490 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/4186692

The Russian budget now consistently runs a deficit, squeezed by a slowing civilian sector of the economy and burdened by a defense sector that has ballooned to account for more than 40% of all fiscal expenditures. Last year, the Ministry of Finance, in its draft budget for 2025-26, planned for a wind-down of military spending to previous levels. However, with the war dragging on and the postwar needs to replenish depleted arms stockpiles growing, it now envisages elevated spending on defense and national security until the end of the budget planning window in 2027.

The deficit is thus here to stay, and there is little doubt that its actual size will be bigger than planned: if we have to buy shells and even soldiers from North Korea, while the federal budget pays Russian citizens RUB 400,000 just for signing up for the army (with some regions already offering an additional RUB 3 million), then the 0.5% deficit planned for 2025 will hardly be the end of it.

This means additional revenues are needed. But where to source them?

The obvious answer is big business. And that’s what happened at the beginning of the war. For example, since its introduction in 2023, the windfall tax has brought in RUB 318.8 billion [...] Because of the windfall tax, combined with the loss of the European gas market and a normalization in gas prices, Gazprom reported a colossal loss of RUB 629 billion for 2023, becoming the most unprofitable company in Russia.

[...]

From January 1, 2025, a new, progressive personal income tax will come into effect: the state’s take on annual income of RUB 2.4 million or higher will increase from 13% to 15%.

[...]

Importantly, the tax burden on individuals was never as low as it is commonly believed: in reality, the average Russian paid about 53% of his earnings to the state. But the trick was that he saw the flat 13% personal income tax, while propaganda convinced him that this was it.

Contributions to various funds – pension, social and medical insurance – are taken out of employees’ salaries by employers. Not to mention the 10-19% VAT that everyone pays when they make any purchase. But Russians for the most part do not think about or simply do not know about these charges, often believing that since employers make social payments, the money comes out of someone else’s pocket.

It is precisely this lack of understanding that the Russian authorities are seemingly trying to take advantage of. When you look closely, you see that all the new levies are hidden so that the money can be extracted as inconspicuously as possible.

[...]

  • The proposed automated tax payments for small business [which would mean small-business owners could not challenge automated payments] will go completely unnoticed, though this measure alone, with skillful manipulation of how the tax bill is calculated, could provide a tangible boost to the budget. After all, if the overcharge is slight, taxpayers, as a rule, will not dispute it – it is more expensive to take it to court.

  • Meanwhile, the introduction of a **tax on childlessness **is being hotly debated – advocates want to make it rather painful. If it is really set, as proposed, at RUB 30,000-40,000 per month (which is still unlikely), it will be trumpeted as promoting fairness: after all, someone’s children will have to pay for the pensions of the childless.

  • With excise duties on petroleum products, alcohol and sugary drinks, it is even easier: people typically do not attribute higher prices for gasoline and food to excise duty hikes, instead blaming “greedy traders.”

[Edit title for clarity.]

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Right those without children will not have children paying into their pensions, so they want to tax what it would normally cost to raise a child? But don’t the childless also fund schools and daycare and whatnot through the taxes they pay?

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A large tax for adults without a child is absolutely insane.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Username checks out.