this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
394 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

58970 readers
3750 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Original Link.

More info.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 27 points 3 days ago

Fake news got its feelz hurt

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I would expect something like this from my mother country sooner than India. Surprised but not that surprised. The precedent being set is concerning.

[–] Jozav@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

The precedent was years ago with Facebook and WhatsApp blocking alleged anti government messages (which the court branded as anti-nation, sedition). Last year the BBC documentary about Modi and alleged fascism was world news and led to the departure of BBC from India. The problem is that the world sees India as an emerging market where in fact it is a fascist country in the making.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (8 children)

How can they block this for everyone?

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

it's more of a blackmail. Wikipedia could have kept the article online for everybody but they would have deprived 1,5 billion people in India of the whole Wikipedia.

The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site".

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, how can they sue a company based in another country.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

i'm guessing that it must be like Xitter in Brazil. If a company is present in a country, they may require a legal representation which can be held accountable.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

This is pretty big news, I would think it would be relevant in way more than just one article, time to do some updating.

[–] sag@lemm.ee 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

WTF, If wikipedia get blocked in my country. Then, I am just graduating to leave my shitty country.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

the list of countries you will be leaving is long ☞ https://sh.itjust.works/post/27190154

[–] sag@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ludrol 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If recent news about Antarctica turning green more rapidly is to go by, one might just find fruits there soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jozav@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You should leave anyway if you have a chance. Germany looking for 70.000 skilled Indians.

Germany wants the immigrant but i don't think young germans want that. Look at the recent rise of AFD among young germans. Maybe they need immigrants so when the economy goes down they can blame it on immigrants

[–] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago

Hahaha go ahead and block it you dumb fucks, only your citizenry will suffer.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago

Somehow it doesn't surprise me that India wants to ban free flipping knowledge

[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 13 points 3 days ago

Seems like a good opportunity to remind folks about the Kiwix project, which allows you to download local private copies of select information such as Wikipedia. It was originally created to provide offline access to content for countries that were otherwise blocked, but events like this have sparked some recent discussion about archiving older files to preserve history.

[–] veniasilente@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

So, lemme get this straight: Wikipedia is being censored (worldwide, might I add) because a party complains that they are reported of as being accused of a thing, or because of the thing itself?

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Shame on Wikipedia for taking down the article!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Jozav@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago
[–] Eideen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why not allow India to block Wikipedia? Or have a filter that hides Indians dark secrets, when coming from India.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Because it's the government of india that wants to block wikipedia for Indian citizens.

[–] clifton@friendica.world 4 points 3 days ago

@Dot How incredibly disappointing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›