this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
1356 points (96.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

5576 readers
3566 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like a basket of deplorables to me.

[–] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

No, you mustn't say!

[–] auzy@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago

You're not wrong.

These are the same people onsite who never take responsibility.

Also, they're willing to listen to children. Literally saw one yesterday comment on Facebook repeating the "kamala," nonsense.

Seriously, they act like children.. Their dictator is literally a child, and no body in high school even would act this way

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 30 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm never happy and it didn't turn me into a MAGA dipshit. I don't think I'm even an asshole most of the time or at least I try not to be.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Maybe you should blame others more, especially foreigners, liberals, and education. Your problem is that you’re not blaming the right people.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I hadn't considered projecting my self-loathing onto others...

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Only then will you become a real ~~Jedi~~ MAGA.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I think the larger thing lacking is two-fold.

  1. Perspective. These people lack the ability to look at the world objectively and outside themselves to see the larger picture of where they fit in the world. They are unable or unwilling to comprehend anything remotely complex.

  2. Empathy. They are unable or unwilling to walk a step let alone a mile in anyone's shoes but their own.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 13 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

On 1, someone pointed out to me that a lot of people who are susceptible to MAGA are people who don't know what it is to be an expert on something.

They don't have PhDs and MDs and JDs in their social or peer groups. They assume everyone's knowledge of complex things is as superficial and uncertain as their own; literally they do not recognize the difference between things stated as fact versus things stated as opinion. Their day-to-day practice, as far as anything complex, is to let their emotions rule; practice makes perfect.

The thing they exercise most is their amygdala, and that's why conservatism causes an enlargement of the amygdala.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Compassion is also frequently lacking.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Compassion is a natural result of Empathy: those who feel as if their own a bit of other people's emotions don't want others to be unhappy if only because that makes them feel a bit unhappy themselves.

This also applies to positive emotions, so those with higher Empathy are more likely to want others to feel good as that makes them feel good hence their notion of A Better World also includes what's good for other people rather than purely what's good for they themselves.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 57 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (97 children)

MAGA is popular for the same reason other nationalist, fascist movements have risen over the course of modern history: as a response to Capitalist decay. MAGA isn't popular for genetic reasons, intellectual inferiority, or other reasons like that, but as a common class interest. All of the descriptors in the OP are consequences of the driving factor of class interests, not the drivers themselves.

Fascism is most often represented as an alliance between the Petite Bourgeoisie and Bourgeoisie proper, driven by the Petite Bourgeoisie, as monopolization of Capital results in competition becoming more and more difficult, and the Petite Bourgeoisie faces Proletarianization. To prevent the Petite Bourgeoisie from joining the Proletariat in solidarity, the Bourgeoisie proper turns their hatred against the Proletariat and Lumpenproletariat.

What does this all mean, in practical, American terms? Small business owners, landlords, ie the "middle class," is shrinking in power, so the Small Business Owners are aligning with billionaires like Musk and Bezos against immigrants, workers, unhoused peopled, gender/sexual minorities, women, ethnic minorities, and more.

How do we fix this? Grow the Petite Bourgeoisie and restore their position? Absolutely not! That's when fascism is established. Trying to "turn the clock back to the good old days" results in dramatic reductions in worker rights and a solidification of power.

What we need to do is establish Socialism. A victory of the Proletariat, a folding of the large monopolist syndicates into the public sector so they can be centrally planned for the public good, rather than privately planned for profit, is the way forward. This is the way to escape fascism's rise. This is the way to defeat MAGA.

I recommend reading the book Blackshirts and Reds, fascism's irrationality has rational, material origins, that can be understood and defeated, and it isn't in the "marketplace of ideas."

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Why not both?

Clearly some people are attracted to far-right ideals without being in the petite bourgeoisie and some people who are in it are even repelled by such ideals, plus there is the whole domain of the "highly educated" who tend to be less attracted to far-right ideals and yet are often generally more prosperous than most shop keepers and similar and some even work in similar business structures (such as Architects with their own Studios or Lawyers with their own small Legal Practices) hence would count a that kind of petit burgeouisie.

I would say that it's a mix of what you point out (so people's petit burgeouis status or, as I would put it: "people who have just enough material wealth to think they're wealthy but without the education and worldliness to understand that they're nowhere close to real wealth"), certain character traits such as one's level of Empathy and Self-awareness, one's breadth of life experience (not in term of years but of how many different things one has done and seen and kinds of people one has met, which would explain why city people are less likely be attracted to the far-right that more provincial types) and one's style of thinking and practice with things like analysing real world situations and trying to solve real world problems (which would partly explain the effect of Education, the other part falling into breath of experience, specifically in the form of how much information one has the tools to understand).

This is without even going into the environment one grew up in and lives in: sometimes that kind of thinking is so widespread in one's family and were one lives that showing the social cues of far-right belief and even believing it is a natural element of fitting in if only for one's own protection, similarly to how people tend to be religious when coming from a religious family and living in a religious community.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

It isn't an iron-clad rule, but a tendency. Individuals vary, groups act on aggregates.

load more comments (96 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›