this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
239 points (94.4% liked)

News

23160 readers
2785 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Not only hypocrisy, but also not true at all lol.

Biden pretty much okay'd Universities arresting their students to stop protests because his lobbyists threatened to withhold funding for both the party and each respective university.

Of course he didn't care about the zionist mob that attacked UCLA students, so it's pretty clear where he stands.

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is Peak Liberalism. Saying this while genociding them.

"we SEE you, we HEAR you, but Israel needs money . . ."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] machinin@lemmy.world 126 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Stop enabling the genocide? Please?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All they have to do is pledge to follow the Leahy Law....

Israel won't comply, which means we legally can't provide arms. Kamala doesn't even have to be "the bad guy", she can just say she's choosing to follow American law and if Israel wants arms then they can comply like every other recipient has to.

It's really as easy as saying:

If elected I will not break American law to send arms to foreign countries.

Boom, election locked up.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

You people really have a massively inflated concept of how many voting progressives that there are. Get off the internet for a while...

Harris would 100% lose the election if she said that.

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

How many voters would she lose if she declared intent to stop assisting Isreal?

She might possibly gain a few, but would she lose any?

[–] Keeponstalin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Any voters she would lose are far outweighed by the amount of voters she'd get. It's about 5:1 from what the polls indicate, or about a +6 point gain. Quite significant considering how dead-locked the race is right now

Quote

Our first matchup tested a Democrat and a Republican who “both agree with Israel’s current approach to the conflict in Gaza”. In this case, the generic candidates tied 44–44. The second matchup saw the same Republican facing a Democrat supporting “an immediate ceasefire and a halt of military aid and arms sales to Israel”. Interestingly, the Democrat led 49–43, with Independents and 2020 non-voters driving the bulk of this shift.

Quotes

In Pennsylvania, 34% of respondents said they would be more likely to vote for the Democratic nominee if the nominee vowed to withhold weapons to Israel, compared to 7% who said they would be less likely. The rest said it would make no difference. In Arizona, 35% said they’d be more likely, while 5% would be less likely. And in Georgia, 39% said they’d be more likely, also compared to 5% who would be less likely.

Quotes

Quotes

Quotes

Majorities of Democrats (67%) and Independents (55%) believe the US should either end support for Israel’s war effort or make that support conditional on a ceasefire. Only 8% of Democrats but 42% of Republicans think the US must support Israel unconditionally.

Republicans and Independents most often point to immigration as one of Biden’s top foreign policy failures. Democrats most often select the US response to the war in Gaza.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago

Yes. Enough to lose. These people don't seem to understand this (or refuse to)

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

It's a valid question and I'm sure the Harris campaign has spent considerable resources trying to get a good estimate of that number.

It's pretty insane that the Democratic party officials have to say, "We'd love to stop funding a genocide but our members won't vote for us if we do that."

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Is not about voters, it's about money. Both parties are bribed to keep it going.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Best they can do is thoughts and prayers. Oh wait, that was school shootings. Never mind then.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

School bombings don't qualify.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Israelis don't have the guts to even look the children in their eyes as they slaughter them. Cowards.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 1 points 3 hours ago

Of course they look them in the eyes! It helps them aim for the head!

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When they actually face real soldiers like in Southern Lebanon they get their arses handed to them.

All they know is blow up pager, burn refugee camp, bomb hospitals, shoot pregnant women in belly, rape men to death, and sniper bullets in kid’s heads.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I'm also offended by Israeli war crimes but I don't think that's an accurate assessment.

As far as I can tell, the Israeli military is very good at violence. They're extremely well equipped, they have superb training, and their military personnel tend to be dedicated to their cause.

The main problem isn't their ability to kill and destroy, it's their indiscriminate use of that ability.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

machinin was thrown out of a window

Anybody? Any solution will do, cmon people

[–] Lennny@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Not those islams!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] blunderworld@lemmy.ca 71 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you aren't anti-arab a nice gesture might be to stop murdering them.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

But there is a lot of water in Lebanon. Israel wants that.

[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No more Islamophobia if there aren’t Islamic people any more 🤷‍♂️ /s

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, good luck with that. Islamophobia is one of Trump's tentpoles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Letsdothis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Anti-arab hate... let's see... Arab hate is bad, so anti-arab hate is good... but they are trying to "counter" anti-arab hate, so that's bad?

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Peak liberalism

This is pure Liberal brainrot, sometimes reality feels like a parody of itself. I dont even have much to say tbh, im too tired for this bs.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Setting aside the hypocrisy, is it just me or is it infuriating how the whole article is a whole lot of nothing?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›