Programming

17325 readers

143 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

Podman is a daemon-less alternative to Docker, but with Rootless containers, grouping containers in pods, and systemd integration. What do you think of it? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/programming@programming.dev

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Podman is a lot like Docker: a tool for running OCI containers. While it maintains backwards compatibility with Dockerfile and docker-compose syntax, it offers a lot of other benefits:

daemonless: it can run containers without a daemon process running in the background.
Rootless: can run containers without root privileges
pods: can group containers into secluded pods, which share resources and network namespace

Podman has other features I haven't explored yet, like compatibility with Kubernetes yaml file, and being able to run containers as systemd units.

Have you used podman before? What are your thoughts on it?

top 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] sbstp@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

I tried replacing some components of my NAS server that were on docker/docker-compose with podman but unfortunately it was not a 100% drop-in replacement. I had networking issues in podman that I did not have in docker.

The network stack is implemented quite differently in podman than in docker, once you start using more advanced features the backward compatibility disappears.

Since it came second, I think it has a lot of technical advantages, avoiding docker's mistakes and what not. In the long term I'll probably switch to it, unless Redhat keeps shooting itself in the foot...

[–] Bizarroland@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was scrolling through and this caught my eye but I totally misread it on first glance, I thought you typed "Pokemon is a demon" and I had to stop and scroll back cuz I was like oh shit this is going to be a good thread.