this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
23 points (81.1% liked)

Apple

17469 readers
279 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
MichelleG@lemmy.world
RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world
thisisdee@lemmy.world
23
iPhone 16 and 16 Pro review: A worthy upgrade after three years (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The good

  • These phones still have some of the best screens you can buy—even the non-Pro iPhone hits it out of the park
  • They have by far the best smartphone performance, too
  • Solid gains in GPU performance
  • Camera Control brings the long-awaited physical shutter button
  • The customizable Action button makes its way to the base iPhone
  • New photographic styles allow you to move away from the pitfalls of Apple's computational photography decisions in any direction you choose
  • High-end camera features previously reserved for more expensive models have trickled down
  • Ultra-wide photos in low light got quite a bit better
  • Battery life improvements are always welcome

The bad

  • 60 Hz on the non-Pro phones is looking a bit long in the tooth
  • Likewise, always-on displays are now standard in some of the iPhone 16's direct competitors
  • The Pro phones don't offer enough to justify an upgrade over the base models for the majority of consumers
  • Possibly the most subtle year-over-year upgrades in iPhone history—if that's really a bad thing

The ugly

  • Not much, other than the steep prices
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The really bad: no side loading for non-EU, no Newpipe.

[–] FrankLaskey@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the point about the 3 year upgrade cycle being optimal unless you are a real enthusiast is right on the money. I’d say I’m moderately interested in tech improvements in this space and it seems ideal for me as I will be considering an upgrade from an iPhone 13 Pro (likely informed by how gimmicky or actually useful the Apple Intelligence stuff becomes and if I can offload my ChatGPT Pro subscription). If you’re really not a huge phone tech person or looking for the best camera quality then every 4 years is probably completely reasonable as well. At that point, the battery life is probably starting to suffer as well..

[–] Snowcano@startrek.website 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I’m fairly tech savvy, still on my Xr and feel no reason to change. Battery will probably be the deciding factor before anything else.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I wish we could still replace the batteries. They claim it's enclosed for water resistance, but my watch is way more water resistant with a replaceable battery than any phone is. I think it's all about forcing you to buy a new phone.