this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
125 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59174 readers
2198 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Probably the end of facebook in the EU someone will come out with a Clone and make it free with no ads

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Why? Who would have the infrastructure and funds to create a free and ad-free Facebook clone that can take over the scale of the Facebook userbase? What do you think happens when donations aren't covering your Lemmy instance by a wide margin?

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] 520@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Considering we're already on an ad-free Reddit clone?

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Which clearly isn't as big and mainstream as Reddit

It's not the end of Reddit

[–] 520@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reddit was around for a long time as a competitor to Digg before the latter shot itself in the ass. Reddit is still in the 'fuck around' phase with a hint of 'find out'.

Rome wasn't built in a day.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Digg was nowhere close to as big as reddit is now.

Look at all the dumb shit twitter has done and it still is a gargantuan platform. Like it or not, these platforms aren't going anywhere.

[–] joseangel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Very few people actively delete their accounts, but platform eventually die if they can't attract the next generation (young users). Less than 20% of the youth use Facebook for example, because they don't want to be in the same platform as their parents watching them, it will be a long painful day death. Same thing can happen to any platform.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook just hit it's record high of 4 billion monthly active users lol

[–] joseangel@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Just because it's profitable now, doesn't mean it's going to be the case in the future or be sustainable (example, fossil fuels).

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 5 points 1 year ago

And that there's already federated Facebookesque software out there. I've not looked into it, mind you. I don't think there's a market much for Facebook replacements. Most people able to know about a federated equivalent probably don't want to be on Facebook, and if they're on it at all are just there to interact with the few holdouts that insist on remaining there and are secretly hoping it self-destructs.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 year ago

We've got one that is orders of magnitude smaller and has no where near the number or quality of communities as Reddit.

[–] Jode@midwest.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's great, but a hundred bucks says they'll be ad free for those subscribers for 5 years or so and then they will creep back in, then you'll need a Facebookplus+ subscription to get rid of the ads.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Lol Facebookplus+STierPlatinum+

[–] jerome@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Life uh... Finds a way.

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I actually think that's a good idea, but it would be nice to have some extra features too.

Kinda like YouTube premium

[–] Wootz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Compared to YouTube, how much do you actually use Facebook?

[–] joseangel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Youtube doesn't have real competition because hosting video is much more expensive than text. That's why Google doesn't make individual reports about YouTube, it's most likely not profitable.

[–] nix@merv.news 3 points 1 year ago

It’s still wild to me twitch saves full VODs but doesn’t allow strangers to cut/upload videos to compete with YouTube

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They do make individual reports and it is profitable?

[–] newIdentity@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It hasn't been profitable for a long time. Its only recently that it became profitable

Edit: I actually couldn't find anything about it's profability and most sources say it's not really profitable.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

A lot less than I would is every other item in my stream wasn't an ad.

[–] dumdum666@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As if some kind of subscription would make Meta stop with it’s surveillance… this will just be in top.

[–] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I mean, it said ad free, not data collection free.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Oct 2 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O) is exploring options to introduce ad-free subscription plans for Instagram and Facebook users in Europe, a person familiar with the matter said on Tuesday.

The proposal is an attempt by Meta to circumvent European Union regulations that threaten to curb its ability to personalize ads for users without their consent and hurt its major revenue source.

Offering a choice between a free, ad-supported plan and a paid subscription might lead to users opting for the former, helping Meta comply with regulations without affecting its ad business.

On mobile devices, the price for a single account would jump to roughly 13 euros because Meta would factor in commissions charged by Apple's and Google's app stores, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The social media company was fined 390 million euros earlier this year by Ireland's Data Privacy Commissioner and told it cannot use the so-called "contract" legal basis to send users ads based on their online activity.

A Meta spokesperson said the company believes in "free services which are supported by personalized ads", but is exploring "options to ensure we comply with evolving regulatory requirements".


The original article contains 313 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 39%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!