this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
7 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16213 readers
1065 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bbmb@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, I don't blame them for not wanting to put up with Unity's unreliance. It took Unity 10 days after announcing this awful change to backtrack to a normal revenue cut. That 10 days was filled with justified outrage from a ton of developers to the point of Re-Logic donating $100k to Godot and FNA in protest.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Those ten days were them seeing if it would 'blow over'. Can't trust them an inch now

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

When will they learn? You could possibly pull that crap Business to consumer... BUT B2B? Hell no!

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

That's what confused me the most. When your customers are consumers, screwing them over might be no big deal. But when your customers are businesses, how were you planning to get away with something like this where anything involving fees in the 6 to 9 figures is game changing. That's, "Cheaper to move my business elsewhere" levels of money.

[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

Nah, they'll go back. If it's one thing I've learned from Greedy companies doing dumb shit. People will always go back to trust them again.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Fantastic, let them die Let a company, just once, learn a lesson

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago

I'm sure the person responsible for the change is going to be feeling devastated as they buy back all the stocks for fractions of what they paid.

[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They fucked themselves like WotC (Wizards of the Coast) did with the OGL (Open Gaming Licensing) changes.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works -1 points 11 months ago

I wonder who is gonna fuck up like that next. I wanna start shorting them now.

[–] The_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if this will result in the shareholders holding the ex-EA CEO accountable for destroying their revenue stream.

[–] kryllic@programming.dev 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's times like this I wish we did things more like china. The one person who is actually responsible for this change is going to get a huge payout, but the same can't be said for everyone else at the company whose lives are going to be completely thrown off from the incoming layoffs.