this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
228 points (97.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5023 readers
830 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Only 1 billion? I think they have caused way more than that in damages.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

I was gonna say, $1B for the damage they've caused spreading disinformation alone is a bargain.

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The only way to damage the big companies is with proportional fines.

You destroy the environment? 50% of your income gained in every country goes to those countries. I don't know why this isn't being advocated anywhere because measuring income is easy, the company has to do taxes and if they don't, 75% fine with the profits correctly calculated.

Just bleed them dry.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Because its much more profitable for the lawmakers to pocket a 150 million donation and leave the law alone.

[–] dephyre@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Hope they win. BP alone has $206.042B in revenue just within the last year. It's going to take a lot of lawsuits to even make a dent, but you gotta start somewhere.

[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago

Puerto Rico has to be one of the worst victims of the industry with also the least recourse due to a lack of statehood