this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
116 points (99.2% liked)

News

21742 readers
3413 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Alternate headline: “Supreme Court will take bribes from vape manufacturers and rule in their flavor.”

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

No no... they take the bribes AFTER ruling in their favor. Total Legal now. They decided it was.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 52 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I am going to go out on a limb here and say that the flavored ecig companies will tip scotus to rule in their favor.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

I suspect they'll offer compelling scuba vacations—oops, I mean arguments

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They need to side with the companies on this. The FDA fucked things up royally to crush the industry.

Edit: if anyone wants to know how they did this, it's because of the Premarket Tobacco Product Applicatios (PMTA) process.

Basically, for every single SKU you made, you had to submit the application which costs about $250k minimum. This means that if you have a line of 10 flavors in 4 different nicotine strengths, you'd need 40 applications. Their guidelines for the applications were also super vague, basically guaranteeing they could deny all of them.

And that's just the most egregious thing they did. They also labeled anything relating to vaping a tobacco product, including wire and batteries. Which would also be subject to the PMTA process.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yep, the ecig industry has helped a epic amount of people quit smoking and fewer people to just vape vs picking up smoking cigs. It's insane how against the grain regulators went with this.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's because they weren't subject to the tobacco tax that cigarette companies must pay due to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA). Now the vaping industry is all but decimated outside of disposables, but you can still go buy your favorite cigarettes at any corner store.

[–] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yup, it was all about the taxes. If you look at basically any study on vapes that has come out of the US, the methodology is designed to produce negative results.

If the FDA cared about public health they would have actually regulated the market, instead of guaranteeing the market was flooded by sketchy Chinese disposables which generate a shit ton of dangerous and hazardous waste.

They would also ban cigarettes if they actually cared.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I won't be shocked if they make them legal for 2-year-olds.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

They will unless those 2-year-olds pay up. Justices need cruises to clear their heads before making important decisions.

[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago

Obama, Trump, and Biden all had antivape stances and now the US is littered with iffy products instead of regulating and doing it proper

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago

Given the recent track record I can only assume vaping will be mandatory after their ruling.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Why don't they just go ahead and deregulate everything then? Kids haven't been getting enough lead in their diet for decades.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago

I see they're trying to beat the news cycle with some boring dystopia shit.

They are trying to flood the zone.

They are the gish gallop debaters of the federal government.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Ah great - SCOTUS will likely side with the e-sig companies, with absolutely no bribes involved, then e-cig companies will flood the market with colourful, flavoured products designed to entice young people (who may never have smoked otherwise) into starting on e-cigs.

I knew what these were the moment I first saw them advertised as a way to get people to quit smoking - they are, and always were a trojan horse designed to entice a new generation of nicotine addicts. Nothing more, nothing less.

[–] justgohomealready@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I actually used vapes (the "real" ones) to stop smoking. It took years, but having the capability of controlling how much nicotine I had in my vape liquid was key. Eventually I brought it down to zero, and was able to stop.

This said, in europe the market is being flooded with disposable, colourful vapes - and those are an abomination. Just thinking of trashing all those lithium batteries makes me angry.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Here in Canada they are replacing refillable vapes with those trash filling disposable and the only nicotine level available are 20 or 0. No more 12, 6, 3mg, noooooo that would actually help reducing nicotine intake.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The 20mg ones are nic salts which work a bit differently which is why they're stronger. The refillable "freebase juice" is what came in 3, 6, 12mg and it sounds like it's getting banned. Nic salt is supposed to be used at much lower wattage so that you get less with each puff but it works faster (similar to a cigarette). Pretty much all the disposables use nic salts.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

I get it but it still would be great to have stepping down levels of nicotine. Why 20 only. I want to quit not replace.

[–] 555_1@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

They don’t call them bribes anymore. It’s called gratuity, and they just voted that was perfectly legal.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How many RVs will this vote take?

[–] spyd3r@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

A couple of Winnebagos, and a handful of Airstreams maybe.