this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27254 readers
1478 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That chiropractic care is not evidence based

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

For people who don't know, the theory of chiropractics is that the light of God somehow shines into the human body through the top of the head, travels down the spine, and on through the nerves. If you can just fix any blockages (aka "subluxations") in that flow then it will be impossible for disease to exist in the body. Because God's light.

The founder of chiropractics was told this information by a ghost.

I know some people swear by chiropractic adjustments, but this is information I wish I'd known when I had my back injury because going to a chiropractor set my recovery back by at least three years. And the money I lost to that quack could have paid for not only the legit physical therapist that actually got me feeling better, but probably a decent massage chair too.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

God isn't real. No deities exist. Stop being delusional.

[–] pelletbucket@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago

American cars having their brake lights and turn signals be the same light is stupid and dangerous.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Homeopathic" does not mean organic, or good for you, natural, wholesome, effective, or inherently safe to consume.

It is, in fact, a code word for no active ingredient.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The left lane is for passing. If you're not passing somebody, move over to the right lane. It's not that hard people

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Left lane... on the highway maybe. In the city it is definitely usable for navigation purposes, getting to the intended destination.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

In the city it is definitely usable for navigation purposes, getting to the intended destination.

So is the right lane. If you're driving the same speed as the car in front of you, you have no reason to use the left lane. Unless you're making a left turn. Right?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

I dont agree, I use the left lane frequently to not have a car in front of me. Increases visibility and security a lot, and just gives a nice feeling of not being blocked.

I do drive a bit faster than cars in the right lane almost always though.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is better to have angry drivers behind you?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No I drive fast enough to never have cars behind me. :) So Im actually not part of the problem the thread was discussing, with drivers just driving the same speed in the left lane. That is really frustrating when people do that.

I would go as far as saying that this behavior of driving faster in the left lane helps to make traffic flow a lot better and avoid congestion. But it's not legal.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

A little while ago, people were complaining incognito mode didn't do what they thought it did.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (10 children)

That you need to wash your hands after going to the bathroom. I’ve seen too many grown men walk straight out of the restroom after urinating.

[–] Chaos0f7ife@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I feel so nasty if I don't wash my hands after using the bathroom.

I'm not a germaphobe, but I refuse to touch bathroom handles. I will grab a paper towel and use it to turn on and off the faucet and open the bathroom door.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You cannot achieve any good by hurting people.

People are so convinced that if we're more cruel to criminals, they'll stop committing crimes, or if we're harsher to workers, we'll work harder, or if you're tough on border controls, immigrants will go away. It does not work and it cannot work.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Idk, if someone's trying to do a mass shooting, a little intervention could do some good.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Less good than helping the shooter before they went over the Rubicon...I think that's the point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Related to the current election, that OG conservatives, or Reagan and Bush conservatives (referring to George H. W. Bush) are the same thing as MAGA conservatives.

The difference is, the old guard blithely preserved the kind of policies that shredded social safety nets and business regulations in favor of tax cuts, leading to precarity and the rise of paranoia that led to the Trump takeover in 2015.

The OGs just wish they had another mile or two of altitude to plummet, and are freaked out about the ground looming so close and rushing so fast. But they will still keep the same policies, and will still lay a ground of Ayn Randian, Reagan-worshiping Mitt Romney / Jeb Bush / Ted Cruz candidates until some other charismatic narcissist Mussolini-wanabe rushes in and plucks the whole party from their hands again. And they'll get all butt-smoochy with the new guy like Lindsey Graham did with Trump (after predicting how this loose cannon will end the Republican party).

They didn't just buy the ticket to ride. They bought stocks in the railroad line, and insisted that fascism-backed one-party autocracy was the destination. They knew it since Reagan. By George W. Bush it was showing serious signs even before the PATRIOT act.

So when people freak out today because we're on the brink of losing our democracy, I have to wonder where they've been the last two decades. How is it after George W. Bush, and torture and Iraq and the pig lagoons and Abstinence-Only sex ed, did you think another Republican president was a good thing? I know Clinton was scary, but did you take even one look at Trump?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (9 children)

All rich people became rich because people like you and me are paying more for services and things than they're truly worth, which means we pretty much never get our money's worth even when we feel like we do.

There are no good rich people.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If the point of getting a job is so that you can eventually retire one day, and you know what you want to do when you retire, you should start doing what you want to do now while you can enjoy it.

Similarly, If you feel like the place you were born in makes you unhappy, move to a different place. There are so many places.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that the one thing I want to do that I'm not already doing is "not work"

I don't have any grand plans to take up new hobbies or anything in my retirement (though I'm sure I'll continue collecting hobbies just as I always have) I just want to be able to do them on my own schedule

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That was my focus too, finding a way to have more time to myself on my own terms.

I usually suggest teaching English abroad if you're a native speaker.

You could chant primary colors at kindergarteners online line for a maximum of 20 hours per week, or in person for a maximum of 10 hours per week and clear $400 easy.

You could also teach 20 hours a week for 6 months and then live off the savings for years.

That's minimum wage 400 bucks a week, we'll say you spent $400 for monthly expenses wherever you are, tje other 3 weeks are all your necessary expenses for 3 months without working, or one month partying.

Want to boost your pay? Take an internationally accredited tefl course online for a couple days, pdf tests, that costs 40 bucks and you'll instantly be paid more than the minimum wage($20 an hour's the usual minimum) they pay teachers at any job you apply for.

If having your own time is really the most important thing to you, as it is to me, the process is very simple, especially for native English speakers.

You don't need to do it the rest of your life either.

Work part-time for a few months and then take a year off to figure out If you're doing what you want to be doing. At least you won't be wasting time and money figuring it out.

Do you want to keep vacationing? Then you have already done it and have experience with that.

The next year you vacation it'll be even cheaper and easier than it was the first time.

Do you want to pursue a hobby professionally? You have time to set that up. Or you can pursue the hobby for fun, indefinitely.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You could chant primary colors at kindergarteners online line for a maximum of 20 hours per week, or in person for a maximum of 10 hours per week

That may work for you, and if it does I'm happy for you, but for me, as much as I want more time for myself and my hobbies, one thing I want even more is to not ever spend any amount of time doing anything even remotely like that.

I also have no real interest in working abroad even if I didn't think that job sounded horrible. A week or two of vacation, sure, but by the end of week 2, I'm ready to go home, and that's really the point here, I want to be able to just stay home, and only leave when it's to do something I want to do.

[–] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

So youre sure you don't like the situation you're in, but equally sure you don't want to leave that situation.

You have a lot of company.

Teaching is not the only option, and no, that's not what I do.

It doesn't sound like you're really looking for solutions yet.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He doesn't want to leave that situation for a nightmare shitshow of a downgraded situation.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›