this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2024
68 points (98.6% liked)

Green Energy

2178 readers
100 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why are they putting 70,000 homes on old nuclear weapons sites?! \s

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Hold my Geiger counter, I'm going in!

[–] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social -1 points 2 months ago

The 70000 homes, are already there on the Nuclear Weapons sites.
Gov just realised, the homes needed more power than what the nuclear weapons gave them.

[–] MercurySunrise@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Finally. Jesus fucking christ, took them long enough to do something useful with these sites.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

I was gonna say, these places are 1/40th of a pixel on the map, but those are some sizeable acreages! Pleasant surprise.

And think of the cost savings on maintaining all that land.