this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
334 points (96.6% liked)

News

23305 readers
3692 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Doctors who treat Covid describe the ways the illness has gotten milder and shifted over time to mostly affect the upper respiratory tract.

Doctors say they're finding it increasingly difficult to distinguish Covid from allergies or the common cold, even as hospitalizations tick up.

The illness' past hallmarks, such as a dry cough or the loss of sense of taste or smell, have become less common. Instead, doctors are observing milder disease, mostly concentrated in the upper respiratory tract.

"It isn’t the same typical symptoms that we were seeing before. It’s a lot of congestion, sometimes sneezing, usually a mild sore throat," said Dr. Erick Eiting, vice chair of operations for emergency medicine at Mount Sinai Downtown in New York City.

The sore throat usually arrives first, he said, then congestion.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Nasom@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago (3 children)

As a person who is on the tail end of COVID infection, this describes my current symptoms.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

I never tested myself because I just thought it was a cold, but that describes my symptoms too. Started with sore throat which wasn't too bad and went away. Then the next day congestion and exhaustion, with just a little bit of sneezing.

[–] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

These symptoms lasted nearly a month after my covid infection.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Same for me as well

[–] collegefurtrader@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Do the old covid tests still work? Ive had this cold several times this year and always covid negative.

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

The answer is yes they are still as effective, dont let anyone here convince you otherwise. The base protein has not mutated and that is what is being checked when you do this chromatography style test.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have a much higher false negative rate now than they used to. Thats probably due to changes in the virus itself and lower viral load as people have higher levels of immunity now. However if you test positive you can still be pretty certain you have covid.

[–] Foggyfroggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, also recognition that some people may have symptoms and test negative or feel fine and test positive. That’s also why there is no recommendation to test again. If someone pops a positive recommendations say to stay home for 5 days then mask for 5 more. There is no benefit to additional testing because of natural variation in antibody production and function.

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Mind the expiration dates.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

I simply had the worst sore throat I’ve ever had. No congestion. Then I lost my sense of smell for about 6 months. That was awful. Very grateful it came back.

[–] qooqie@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So is there any real way to say if this is because of widespread vaccination or because the virus itself has lost some lethality genes

[–] Hoomod@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not a scientist, but I'd guess mostly B, maybe helped along with some of A.

The goal of a virus is to replicate, and it does that better when it's less lethal

[–] justdoit@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just a very small correction- as with all biology, natural selection will drive a virus to replicate more effectively, that’s it. This does NOT mean a virus will automatically become less lethal over time. That’s an older hypothesis that scientists found was not in line with observation.

The newer hypothesis is known as “virulence-transmission trade-off”. The oversimplification of the idea is that if a mutation increases both transmission and virulence, it will also tend to be selected for. COVID is inconsistent with both hypotheses in certain ways though, so really predicting its virulence in the short or long term has proven difficult. Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10066022/

[–] AEsheron@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The old idea isn't wrong per se, lower lethality is a good survival trait. It just has to be weighed against the value of transmission, which would intuitively have a much higher value. In covid, the lethality rate is even less inpactful because it is contagious for a relatively long period before the host would suffer severe illness. But low lethality is still a good thing, and in such a widespread disease one would still expect that trait to become more pronounced eventually. That doesn't mean it necessarily would, statistically likely doesn't mean certain, especially if a particular mutation gave it a substantial bump to both traits it may never be selected out for example. But the current trend seems to be a result of this likelihood.

[–] justdoit@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The “old idea” is actually baked into one of the parameters of the new model. It’s why I said the old hypothesis “was not in line with observation” rather than being “wrong”. It predicted some trends correctly, but failed to predict many others. Like all science, it needed to update as we gathered more info.

The “new” hypothesis also isn’t perfectly predictive of viral evolution, but it’s more accurate with the observed spread of other diseases. Like all models, it’ll get replaced eventually by something more powerful. Likely sooner rather than later specifically because COVID put a spotlight on a lot of holes in the idea.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Viruses don’t have goals. You are anthropomorphizing them. What viruses do is mutate. If mutations have more fitness, they will spread more effectively. That says nothing about mortality nor morbidity. With this disease it spreads in the early stage, which long before the person who has caught it either dies, recovers, gets long COVID, etc.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

It's not anthropomorphizing, it's abstraction and it's incredibly common in evolutionary science to speak in this manner.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It helps that it already killed millions of the more susceptible early on before immunity started.

Not sure how statistically significant this is in the overall numbers, though.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Scheduled next boost for next week.

I finally caught it earlier this year. Thanks to vax, it was similar to a cold / flu. Was mostly better after a few days.

Medical science is awesome. I couldn't be happier about how it turned out. What a relief.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That was the basic progression when I had it a few months ago if you add fever and chills.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Huh, I have exactly that. Dunno if covid though of just some flu

[–] 121mhz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hardeehar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of the mystery, isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›