this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
550 points (96.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19503 readers
1260 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 119 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Nevermind simply having an OS-level clipboard manager...

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 67 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Win+V works decently enough for me.

[–] jnk@sh.itjust.works 40 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Same for plasma, global clipboard is just more convenient

Global clipboard is chef's kiss. Back when I was on Ubuntu/Gnome, I had to install CopyQ but having one come with the OS is great

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I think windows+v syncs to microsoft servers or something. I remember when I was running chris titus tech's debloat script it removed that functionality.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

I googled it, there is an option to sync it to your Microsoft account, but I can't say whether that's on by default when you turn on clipboard history because I skipped adding a Microsoft account. But if it is, you can turn it off in Settings -> System -> Clipboard.

Holy crap I think that may be why I never used it. Fuck how much Windows likes to calls home

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 months ago (4 children)

There is for windows, and it's further improved if you get power toys too

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] marcos@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Application specific buffers are the first thing I disable on emacs. The OS one isn't just integrated with every other normal piece of software, it's also more powerful and easier to use.

... at least on my Linux, YMMV.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 5 points 6 months ago

The os buffer is just another buffer that I can yank into.

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Windows also has it, but it's disabled by default for some reason

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)

Nah that'd be too intuitive

In all seriousness though, I kinda appreciate moving things around in my editor without losing that one snipet I copied for later

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 months ago (3 children)

ive never had to think about clipboard buffers until i used a modal editor.

now i spend %60 of my time trying to figure out where the copied symbol went.

[–] evatronic@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't have the name handy, but there's at least one plugin for vim that shows buffer previews in a popup. I've got it mapped to leader-sb (for "show buffer").

So far I haven't been brave enough for that feature. It's either "that main place yank goes", "system clipboard", or "that place that makes it disappear" for me

[–] unhinge@programming.dev 6 points 6 months ago

You can see all registers in use with :registers, to paste from a register say "2 in insert mode use key combination <ctrl-r>2 or in normal mode "2p. You can check out more in :help registers. Unnamed register or "" is the system clipboard I think. To copy texts in a register you can prepend yank (/delete/cut, etc.) with that register "_ (for black hole register[^black_hole]) This is for neovim. Have keybinds for them and there saved you a plugin :D

[^black_hole]: Text yanked in this register is gone, i.e. it's not saved in any register.

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Gee, X11! How come your mom lets you have THREE clipboards?

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 months ago

then theyre all ignored by x-clip

xD

[–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wait is that an actual thing?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Yes. X11 replaced X10's obsolete cut buffers (which can be modified by any process) with state-of-the-art selections. There are three selections in X11: a primary, a secondary, and a clipboard.

In modern desktops, the primary selection is overwritten every time you select some text (including in the terminal), which makes its content very ephemeral. You can paste it with the middle mouse button.

The secondary selection is generally not used, but it's present in the specification, and you can use xclip -selection secondary to access it. Wayland doesn't seem to have a secondary selection.

The clipboard selection is what most people understand to be THE clipboard. You have to write to it explicitly (through a keyboard shortcut, API, or CLI tool), and its content persists until it is overwritten, explicitly cleared, or the X server is killed. While the primary and secondary can only contain text, the clipboard can contain many kinds of data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I can't tell if ops joke is "intentionally confusing buffers with registers" and everyone is playing along or if people aren't making the distinction between the two in this thread.

Which is ironic and humorous...potentially by accident.

I'm an idiot and I think I confused the two haha

My thought process based on when I setup my config: "yank copies to my main 'buffer', yank copies to system clipboard through that special 'buffer', and delete deletes without replacing what's in my main 'buffer'. I have multiple clipboards!"

Completely forgot they're called registers and that buffers are just "where text is" (at least as far as I understand it)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 30 points 6 months ago (10 children)

Y'all haven't heard of Windows clipboard history? Windows + V will change your life, I tell ya!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] amphetaminisiert@feddit.nl 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

And I still don't really know how to use registers in vim 😂 I just use yy and paste 🥲

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

You just do " (listen for next character as register name)

Then, say q,w,e etc, then yy to yank as normal.

So "wyy

To retrieve it you use "wp

To add to it "Wyy

To view them :reg

Remember you can make "w anything, like "x or "p

And each time you yank it gets pushed into the default register history "0 "1 "2 etc

[–] emergencybird@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

I didn't know about registers, thank you for this!

[–] amphetaminisiert@feddit.nl 4 points 6 months ago

Ok I have to save that 🥲 thanks!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I only know how to use them with q. I hope that's a register, otherwise I will look foolish.

[–] suy@programming.dev 4 points 6 months ago

They are. Registers are just "named boxes" where you can store some text and/or keystrokes. When yanking and pasting, the unnamed register is used if you don't specify a name (you can still see or edit it explicitly). For recording a macro there is no default register, though. You need to give it a name.

[–] stepan@lemmy.cafe 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Same thing but reversed with multiple cursors :/

[–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 8 points 6 months ago (6 children)

That's actually the biggest thing I miss about VSCode

[–] chihiro@lemmy.kya.moe 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

https://github.com/mg979/vim-visual-multi

I also missed multiple courses, but I started using vim-visual-multi in my nvim config and it's been great. There's a few others I tried that I couldn't get to work quite right (usually some weird conflict with nvim-cmp) but I've had the best success with vim-visual-multi.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

helix has a pretty good mc system in the select mode.

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

search in selection is such a cool workflow

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 6 months ago (7 children)
[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

they have no use for copy buffers, they are still configuring emacs.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No, but I'm happy to talk to you about our lord and savior nano

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] whats_all_this_then@programming.dev 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obligatory boo and/or hiss

I've also been meaning to give emacs a try but haven't found the time or energy to figure out how to exit vim

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] puppy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Buffers are great. Comes very handy when creating macros in vim.

[–] unhinge@programming.dev 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think you mean registers not buffers. buffers are file(s) loaded in memory while registers contain text yanked/deleted/last command/last search, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DavidP@midwest.social 6 points 6 months ago

Give CopyQ a try. Open source, cross platform clipboard manager with tons of features.

One example option is being able to only ever paste plain text. It also has lots of programming hooks, I have a few for doing things like converting a line-feed delimited list into one delimited by commas and quoting the values.

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (4 children)

I like vim and use it almost every day, but sometimes I miss Strg+D and Alt+F3 from Sublime (multi edit). Block select + c isn't as useful as this.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›