Technology

57418 readers

5569 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

119

Google is (still) losing the spam wars to zombie news-brands (pluralistic.net)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by misk@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Hypx@fedia.io 27 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Google will have to resort to human curation of search results at some point.

[–] stembolts@programming.dev 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Given that Google search only returns like 9 websites now, shouldn't be too hard.

Google sucks now, use duckduckgo or something else.

[–] brewery@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Been using Duckduckgo for a few years now and found it very good, although it's also on the downward SEO ruined path. Have tried Google occasionally and wow is it juat completely full of crap.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We'll go full circle and return to site directories.

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Web Rings ftw

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They won't pay for that, they would probably rather spend money on developing AI curation.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.social 2 points 3 months ago

Yes but if they want an AI to index it, first it would have to figure out what an index is ;-)

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 25 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

It's amazing how bad it is now with SEO-optimisation. Most people (myself included) put "reddit" into the search query to clean things up in the hopes that we'll get something other than an ad-serve/affiliate-sales-linked website, but this really opens you up to being exposed to astro-turfing.

Edit: Really interested to hear if other people have better ideas than this.

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're actually interested in results from Reddit, you should put in site:reddit.com. Otherwise, you're just encouraging/rewarding sites that use that term for their SEO spam.

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Sure, I do ignore those sites but this is a good way of doing it.

[–] almost1337@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Try using before:2023 if you don't need the absolute most recent info

[–] overload@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Hadn't thought of that. Unfortunately generally I'm looking at current products/news more often than not. Makes me worried about the whole dead internet theory if I'm being honest.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Google juices reddit posts now so no need to throw that shit in anymore. There were recent news articles about it coming from the antitrust case against the company. Now many folks use "-reddit" for how bad reddit is these days clogging up search.

[–] sasquash@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

SEO in combination with AI is cancer!

[–] nom_nom_nom_9999@ani.social 2 points 3 months ago

They do this on purpose. Google now only keep enough engineer to keep it search afloat. Everything else focus on ads and dark pattern.