Definitely do this. It puts broadcasters in control of their data and their brand and not the arbitrary whims of some third party.
this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
677 points (98.4% liked)
Technology
58013 readers
3183 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Every company should do it. Have their own instance, have a main corporate account, one for each of their brands, and availability of for staff to have accounts there.
Companies complain about the lack of moderation on twitter under Musk, so do something about it.
In the UK the BBC are running their own instance social.bbc on trial basis, and I think the trial was recently extended.
Hopefully other public bodies will follow suit.
Pretty much all companies should be doing the same thing, not just public bodies.
If you build your house on a king's land, the king owns your house.
You know, it just occurred to me that it'd probably be useful if there were providers providing and maintaining instances as turnkey operations. Most organizations won't want to host themselves, but might still want to pay for a (reasonably cheap) instance.
Anyone know what commercial options are out there? A really quick search didn't turn up anything for me.
Here you go:
https://elest.io/open-source/lemmy
You can sign up and deploy a lemmy instance in a few minutes. Or a mastadon. Or if you are one of those people, even a kbin.
Hey, I resemble that remark!
Nice, thanks!
I wish, and that would also give another push to RSS feeds which are builtin, to follow people without having an account.
I can't believe all public entities didn't jump on ASAP. It just makes so much sense.
I wish CBC would host their own Mastodon server.
What is the Mastodon Lemmy.world equivalent? Like a big, neutral server with minimal censorship and bullshit, and access to most other servers?
Mastodon.world lol its run by the same team
If I'm not mistaken they also run other software too? I just can't think of what else. Definitely both Lemmy and Mastodon. Pretty cool really.
They also run bookwyrm.world! A fediverse alternative of Goodreads.
Oh thank you so much for sharing! I abandoned Goodreads because it lacked trustworthiness (why does an unreleased novel have 10,000 5 star reviews?)
Not federated but I can really recommend trying out hardcover.app/
They're not federated but have very good import/export tools if you want to take your data somewhere else.
Thank you! I'll check that out as well, though I value highly federation.
Me too, hopefully they federate at some point. The team behind Hardcover seem to support the ideas of the open web.... at least data portability and so on. Let's see if a meaningful connection with Bookwyrm is possible in the future.
Advance free give aways in exchange for “honest” reviews. Still shady af.
Well, at least there's the veneer of authenticity, ha. Thanks for the extra context.
That would be mastodon.social https://fedidb.org/network/instance/mastodon.social Not sure about censorship / moderation rules though.
mastodon.social. Don't know about censorship though.