this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
138 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59287 readers
3956 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasnap@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is definitely a 'bankruptcy' level failure. Why would anyone ever use this service again?

[–] Geert@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Agreed. They are done. Who would ever trust them with their data again?

[–] joe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not a cybersecurity expert. Did they make a foolish decision that would warrant a lack of trust, or were they just unlucky?

[–] Geert@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They were moving the servers to another location and connected them all seemingly without any kind of firewall between them. Some servers were infected with malware which then spread out and infected the other ones, including the backup-servers.

[–] joe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah I read that but I don't have the knowledge to say "what a rookie mistake" or "in hindsight that was a bad idea". I take it, it's the former?

[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

No, it's firmly into "utter incompetence" and "Jesus Christ these people are ignoring basic practices"

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

In order for a ransomware attack to do this level of damage there are several layers of problems

  1. They were not properly prepared to prevent the ransomware attack
  2. They lacked either the experience or expertise to mitigate it and contain it once the attack started
  3. They don’t have an existing backup of any of the data lost
[–] Fyurion@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but also a wave of lawsuits will probably gurantee they go bankrupt.

[–] _wintermute@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Great backup strategy lmao "put them all in one place what could go wrong"

Good example of cyber crime causing bankruptcy.

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Suggestions for being able to recreate your own websites:

YIKES... This shows the importance of keeping backups in a different cloud, or on-premise or something - and not trust one provider with your entire company / website

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like how they say "copy from wayback" like 'Save As..' works well on modern websites.

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seriously this. There's so much backend now that websites we view are pretty much created on demand instead just static html, css, and JavaScript.

[–] KelsonV@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And even when you can, saving files one by one from Wayback is a lot slower than re-uploading your local copy to a new server

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully they backed their data up to another cloud. Thots and prayers

[–] madwifi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Thots and prayers

(checks username)

"Thots and players" you mean?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Hmm, looks like there will be some servers on sale soon...

[–] Magister@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago