this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
675 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

60106 readers
1923 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Internet Archive is essential now. I used to use Google Cached for when IA failed. All researchers are now losing that resiliency.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Such bullshit.

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

Cached pages haven't worked on many sites for several years already.

And for specific types of sites, it 100% still is needed and a great tool.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Google is spelled Kagi now. :)

[–] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Was it even still around? I can think of a few times in the past few months where I've tried to find the cached link to a google result and failed. Most recently just two days ago, when a site I wanted to use was down for maintenance.

[–] ConstipatedWatson@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I tried using it three days ago and had to resort to the Wayback Machine instead. Thanks Google!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shininghero@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

No, there are still use cases for it. I usually use it to retrieve web pages from sites that get incorrectly blocked by the firewall at work.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I haven't seen that available for literally years. I thought they killed it long ago.

Google sucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 6 points 10 months ago (4 children)

JFC...at this point I may as well stand up a self hosted search engine.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›