Technology

60115 readers

2590 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

675

Google Search is losing its 'cached' web page feature (www.engadget.com)

submitted 10 months ago by d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz to c/technology@lemmy.world

147 comments fedilink hide all child comments

One of Google Search's oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the "Cached" button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they're no longer required.

"It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google's Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Kagi

https://kagi.com/pricing

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

No fucking way I'm paying a subscription to search something on the Internet. 5$ for 300 searches, lol.

[–] DolphinMath@slrpnk.net 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Beyond that, the money is still going to Google, Yandex, Brave, Bing etc via API payments. If they actually created their own search engine that was any good I’d be more inclined to pay for access.

https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.html

Edit: They do claim to have their own small indexes (Teclis and TinyGem) that they sell API access to, but I’m doubtful it adds significant value.

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 months ago

I have been looking at kagi but their pricing is definitely made to force people to buy the professional $10 package.

100 or even 300 searches/day would be unusable for me, you quickly spend 10 searches refining a query for something special, and when developing you do like 5-10 searches/hour.

A fair pricing model would be

$2/month for 1000 searches/day
$5/month for 5000 searches/day
$10/month for unlimited everything

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Paying for the Reddit API would be cheaper. That's an impressively overpriced search engine.

[–] local_taxi_fix@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I split the duo plan with a friend and do annual and it's $6.30/month for unlimited searches.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today -3 points 10 months ago

Oh shit, it's 5 dollars? That's like.... A cup of coffee. You are right, way too much, so much money.

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Ad based search engines make almost $300 a year off their users

What disingenuous phrasing.

I'd be up for using a product like this, but their popcorn pricing and snark is really off-putting, so I'll never be using this service.