this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
23 points (89.7% liked)

World News

32063 readers
1190 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hangukdise@lemmy.ml 5 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

Not particularly, but it's important progress for a country with essentially zero inter-city trains running.

Such a pity too, the shape of the country just really seems to make so much sense for trains - just run a big north-south line and connect basically everything anyone would care about.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] Speed@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The US is a poor standard for high speed rail, or even trains in general. A better comparison would be with France, where trains can go up to 320kmph.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Something also built by china might be a good comparison. The new high speed trains in Indonesia (also built by china) regularly go up to 350 kmph.

[–] hangukdise@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

Building high quality rail networks requires legal framework to facilitate that given that initial costs are staggering. The US framework simply leaves everything to private initiative and given the multitude of local land regulation and lack of laws to support strategic mobilization at this scale, it is guaranteed the USA will never have a country-wide high speed rail network. There are just too many interests to satisfy in a very diverse legal landscape across cities, counties, and states.

[–] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago

Chile is also... Not as flat as France.

[–] hangukdise@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Class 6 and above are pretty zippy

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 months ago

and about as common as a bigfoot