this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
1198 points (98.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3406 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tara Rule says her doctor in upstate New York was “determined to protect a hypothetical fetus" instead of helping her treat debilitating pain.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bitteorca@artemis.camp 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anti-choice people shot and bombed doctors and clinics so it’s not exactly unprecedented.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So, you're okay sinking to those same lows?

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing is…it worked. People training to be doctors stopped going into abortion-related fields, some schools stopped teaching late-term abortion techniques, and it overall became more difficult to get abortions. And now abortions are becoming illegal again in many states. Their side won.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Not yet. A lot of doctors are leaving those states so that they can practice freely without fear of being prosecuted for doing what's best for their patients. Looking at you, Idaho

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

You say, "won" like nothing can ever change. Dobbs is definitely a step back but I am certain it'll change back in my lifetime. I'm not an American, but where I am, we've adjusted to the threats against abortion providers and I think many US states have done the same.

As the saying goes, "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes. Do you think we're really going to take a doctor like this and sit him down and make him a functioning member of society who treats women with respect?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, he should lose his medical license and potentially suffer other consequences, but that's through the process of a civilized society. The nurse practitioner's actions sound criminal and should be prosecuted as such. No need to act barbaric.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that'll fix society? Because we've been trying it that way for a very long time. Things are getting so much better doing it that way right?

Day by day society is getting more progressive and moving away from things like this right? Right?

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  1. Yes, society is getting more progressive.

  2. Even if it didn't, violence won't solve anything.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We are getting more progressive? When did we get roe versus Wade back? Did we stop trying to outlaw trans people? When did the police stop executing black people in the street just for fun?

These people do what they want because it's literally legal for them to do it. Nobody is doing anything to stop them. Now if they all started getting drug into the middle of the street and sat on fire they would think twice.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

We are definitely getting more progressive. We are in a better position than pre-Roe and I'm sure Dobbs will be overturned in my lifetime. Trans rights and black rights have continued to improve, though slower than we'd like. The idea that "nobody is doing anything to stop them" is provable false.

[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't disagree that violence isn't the correct answer in this situation, but "Violence never solves anything" is just a nice platitude and is demonstrably false. Most of the rights and privileges we have today only came about through violent means. It is more accurate to say violence doesn't solve everything.

Or to put it another way:

The Magna Carta was a peace treaty.
The ideas of a democratic republic were born of the French and American Revolutions
MLK was the peaceful side of a civil rights movement that would not have had the same power without Malcom X and the black panthers.
Overtime, the 5 day work week, unions and most labor protections came at the expense of a LOT of blood in the United States.
Women's Suffrage was not a peaceful movement either.

In the history of most countries, mass violent protest has been the protest most likely to achieve its goals. Saying "Violence never solves anything" is to turn a blind eye to history.

[–] n2burns@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There are exceptions to every rule, but unless violence is being used in defence, there are almost always other ways. For example, experts don't agree whether Malcolm X's violent efforts helped or harmed the civil-rights movement. There's a reason modern unions don't fuck with violence.