this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
1487 points (95.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55064 readers
290 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 130 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel like Transmission is getting unnecessary hate from this chart. It works very good, is stable, efficient...

[–] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

its the perfect client for arr or just simple torreting

[–] xenspidey@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

I disagree, qbitorrent is better. Had problems with transmission in my arr docker VM.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's lthe only one I'd use but...

It really is lacking basic functionality. Hell, o can't even order torrents that are currently running by size or % done, which would be really helpful if it existed

Also, I don't think it's actively developed anymore, I haven't seen an update in its functionality in at least 5 years, maybe even 10

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Hell, o can't even order torrents that are currently running by size or % done, which would be really helpful if it existed

Alright I'll stick with qbittorent

[–] ruben@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

The only downside is no BEP 52 support.