this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
260 points (91.1% liked)

Games

16681 readers
780 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Skyrim had some very compelling narratives, however it has the prior games lore buildup to build off of

I feel like Starfield is a lot more "matter of fact" about it, wherein things are told to you moreso rather then needing to go out and "find" the lore.

I also don't know of any mysteries in the Starfield world that aren't just... Explainable

For example, terrormorphs or starborn, the game just tells you the details with hardly any effort needed to uncover the info yourself.

Maybe I'm just way to into the FromSoft narrative style at this point where there's tons of deep lore but they don't just hand it to you on a platter, makes it more fun to theorize and dig