Asklemmy

43783 readers

885 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

244

Has anyone else been trying to break their reddit-era habit of downvoting? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by TeryVeneno@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

126 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I used to downvote fairly often on Reddit as a sign to disagree or to push down really disgusting bigoted comments. And to be honest, it became a habit to just downvote without replying. However, now that I’m on lemmy and not Reddit I’ve been actively trying to not instantly downvote things and instead move on or take the time to reply. Has anyone else been trying to do this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bet that 99% of comments that are downvoted are not breaking any rules at all, and a mod would do nothing.

I don't know why people keep thinking downvoting is helping the mods... It really isn't about anything other than pushing down opinions you don't agree with. That's how downvoting is used, upvoting is the opposite of that.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

consider the following: technical question gets posted. you get two answers, one wrong but posted quickly, and another correct and more elaborate, but posted much later. the first one will get more upvotes just because it appears first, and the other gets less attention as a result. one way you can counteract this is by introducing downvotes, it's not perfect solution, but it kinda works

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep also a valid usecase. I agree it's useful for technical discussions but at the same time, it's harmful for opinion based discussions.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is why you shouldn't downvote everything you disagree with. That's not what it's for, and we should actively discourage people from using it incorrectly. As Sisyphean of a task as that is, it still matters.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

You cannot change how people use them, no matter how much you want them to use it correctly.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this works better in specialized, technical spaces with little place for opinion (i'm talking about places like r/chemistry where i contributed previously). you can spot very quickly who's wrong by downvotes

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah I guess it makes sense when it's not about opinions.

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

i'm guessing that this property has made reddit a good place for technical discussion in the first place