this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
1001 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

58135 readers
4802 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemm.ee
fry@fry.gs
L3s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
1001
Bluesky sees record signups day after Musk says X will go paid-only (mashable.com)
submitted 1 year ago by geosoco@kbin.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
312 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Why would anyone think Bluesky is any better than Twitter? There are no fundamental differences.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 11 points 1 year ago

It's not owned by Musk, which is what the average casual internet user is currently upset about with Twitter.

[–] Estiar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, if ~~Twitter~~ X keeps changing like it is, there will be a whole bunch of differences

[–] geosoco@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

From a feature-functional perspective, sure, but it's not entirely true. The biggest differentiators for social media are rarely the core features, but the content and friends. There's a few specific groups that have slowly been migrating from Twitter and Mastodon there.

There's a couple of very famous people that have moved over and because the audience is smaller, they tend to engage with people more often.

[–] DrVortex@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

You are right. In principle, the AT protocol is designed for federation. But at the moment, there is only one Bluesky instance that everyone is signing up on. This makes it effectively centralized like Twitter. It is mind-boggling that people are ignoring Mastodon for this.

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Less fascists for one