this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
102 points (97.2% liked)

Fediverse

34335 readers
628 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is really big imo.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kbal@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (17 children)

That's the benefit of Bluesky being totally centralized, not built with any capability for federation: When they decide to add some, they can hardly fail to see that it's best to go with ActivityPub.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thats completely untrue :) .

app.wafrn.net is a separate app that connects to bluesky, atproto.africa is an alternate relay, deer.social is an alt appview.

You can use bluesky without relying on bluesky now.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm, let's see if I remember the terminology correctly:

Client apps have nothing to do with it, obviously.

Alternate appviews have nothing to do with it, except in that they'd presumably need to work with whatever form of atproto federation exists, if any did.

Alternate relays aren't federated unless there's some protocol for routing messages between them — such as ActivityPub.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, bluesky works differently to fedi.

A PDS stores your posts/comments/likes/blocks/articles/whatever. These all get crawled and saved to a relay.
An appview connects to a relay and sorts through all the posts, and indexes them.
They handle all the interactions, rather than passing messages between servers.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let me just ask the less technical and more important questions:

  1. If BSky goes out of business and shuts down their servers, will these continue to function?
  2. Does BSky still have any control at all over moderation?
[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

If bsky goes out of business and shuts down their servers, will these continue to function?

Yes, but there will be far less people since everyone's on bsky.social. Kinda like mastodon.social.

Does bsky still have any control at all over moderation?

Great question! Bluesky has individual moderation services you can subscribe to, and these hide/label posts for you.
bsky has no control over moderation if you are not on their servers, and you are not subscribed to their moderation service.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right... it did take me a minute to remember how the relays work. Well, when there are a few hundred of them we'll see how it goes.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's a good few small ones.

It can work without relays anyway, an appview can crawl PDSes directly.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Really? I thought there were only two. How are the small ones able to afford the bandwidth to monitor everything from every PDS?

[–] wisdomchicken@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

because hosting a full-network relay is super cheap, including bandwidth. there are multiple people who are running full-network relays (monitoring and relaying everything from every PDS) for less than 30USD per month

https://fediversereport.com/atmosphere-report-116/

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 21 hours ago

Well that's an interesting development, which people seem to have begun experimenting with in the past few weeks. Of course for the time being I suppose it's made somewhat easier for the relays by 99% of the users being hosted on the small collection of official bsky.network PDS servers.

Some more discussion of it in which there may be hints as to how atproto people might slowly progress towards reinventing some of the things we take for granted on the fediverse.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This news probably deserve its own post

[–] wisdomchicken@piefed.social 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

i think the main takeaway is that the fediverse has hugely overindexed on relays being this big huge centralising force in the atproto network. And thats simply not true at all. The flipside of that is that relays also dont really matter much either. All they do is simply aggregating from a distributed network of data storage into a single firehose. Its really cool that you can do that for super cheap. but its also just a small part of the entire network architecture. like, atproto relays are not CDNs, for example, and video CDNs are expensive to run.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

The main centralised part of bluesky right now is their decentralised identifiers right now.

DID:PLC is completely centralised. Its not actually a requirement for a did to be decentralised.

plc.directory is the only registry for them right now.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's why I said small ones, they don't crawl the entire network.

There is the freeourfeeds one coming soon.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If they don't crawl the entire network then most of the network cannot contact them at all? Which makes it ... not really a network. That's where federation would come in.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

It does federate though, federation is multiple nodes in a network cooperating, which they do.
HTTP is a network even though it doesn't (usually) federate.

load more comments (15 replies)