this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
81 points (100.0% liked)

Android

30437 readers
194 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

!android@lemmy.ml


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (11 children)

Google’s primary aim with these changes is to improve app security for everyone

Bullshit. Google's primary aim is to make sure that Android builds which aren't Google-approved and may not integrate Google's profitable services as deeply are not commercially viable.

Remember to leave one-star reviews for any apps that use this shit.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

I mean, both things can be true? I know banks are pushing on Google to improve Android security, to avoid malicious apps with root access from messing with banking apps.

The fact is that a rooted phone can definitely be less secure if the user doesn't 100% know what they're doing, in the same way that always logging in as root on a Linux system can be.

[–] kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Configuring one's system to always login as root in Linux is significantly easier than rooting an Android phone. One needs to know their way to root their phone and spend significant amount of time tinkering with it so that everything works properly.

As for malicious apps, there are many such apps on the Play Store as well. In fact, I would argue that the safest distribution channel is F Droid and not Play Store.

I can't speak for foreign banks but for banks in my country, they have a problem that is way way worse than any Android stuff can solve ( read: giving access to your account only via SINGLE password and only asking for SMS OTP when transaction is done; and of course no hardware key support). I don't wish my banking data to be less secure than a WordPress account!

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 4 days ago

In fact, I would argue that the safest distribution channel is F Droid and not Play Store.

I agree with this too! I don't think I've seen any other app stores (on any platform) focus on reproducible builds.

giving access to your account only via SINGLE password and only asking for SMS OTP when transaction is done

This was a problem with US and Australian banks too. It's still an issue in Australia, but some of the major banks in the USA have moved to sending 2FA requests to their mobile app, and either allowing OAuth or app-specific passwords to allow other services to get data from your bank account.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)