It's not a case of being "stuck" per se. It's just not cost effective to move production on this kind of stuff overseas. Shipping goes by volume, and cars have an absolutely atrocious cost to volume ratio (think about how many dollars worth of iPhones you could stuff into the space occupied by a single car). It makes a lot more sense to build them where you plan to sell them (broadly speaking). That's why a lot of car manufacturing still happens in countries like the US, Canada, and the UK.

[–] ironsoap@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not disagreeing, but isn't there also protectionist incentives to at least assembly them in the US too? Benn a while since I remember reading it, but seem to remember there are many tarrifs, tax incentives, and etc that make it a complex situation for auto makers.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I believe you are very likely correct about that, but I wouldn't want to say for sure without doing some digging.

[–] rob64@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

This isn't the most substantive of your comments in this chain, but I think it deserves some attention. It's perfectly worded and it's a concept more people need to embrace: you don't have to speak in absolutes and it's okay to express the limits of your knowledge.

[–] yaaaaayPancakes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Chicken tax is an example.

[–] greenmarty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's what they are good at, comparing costs and maximizing profits.
They will find the way to get around it at least partially even if they have to invest into fully automatic production with limited human labor.