this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1038 points (98.7% liked)

Comic Strips

16449 readers
3561 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1038
Wednesday (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

what was the purpose of your statement?

To point out (what I thought was) a needlessly condescending response.

Your statement lacked context.

It did not. I think it was quite clear how I interpreted the comment I replied to. I mean, you got it. Even if you disagreed.

I rely more heavily on context to fill in the gaps in my knowledge

Again, I was not lacking context. Having "context" doesn't mean that a sentence does not negate the fact that a sentence can still be ambiguous. I think this is perfectly exemplified in this thread.

My point stands. People are way too eager to be aggressive/mock other people when they get the chance instead of considering that the other person might A) just have a different opinion or B) they misunderstood something. When I first started using Lemmy this did not happen so it's a shame that it seems to be attracting the same crowd that made virtual interaction so unappealing in Reddit.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People are way to eager to be aggressive/mock other people when they get the chance instead of considering that the other person might A) just have a different opinion or B) they misunderstood something.

That's interesting that you're accusing everyone of acting that way because I thought that's how you were acting. Maybe you should take a step back and see that you're calling the kettle black.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Almost verbatim what I was planning on saying. Just 0 awareness apparently. This one may be a lost cause, though.

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That may be true from your perspective but it was not my intention. If you make a small effort, you might see that you too can misunderstand someone else's words.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So let me get this straight:

It's perfectly acceptable for you to make an assessment of a word and it's meaning from a post not your own - but utterly incomprehensible that we might make a similar assessment of literally the same word from your post... in exactly the same way.

In what way are people misinterpreting you and being mean while, somehow, your actions which effectively are identical (inference not withstanding) - are justified and erm... kind?

It's rare I will bust out a "my dude" this frequently... but: my dude do you own a mirror?

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let's just nip the speculation in the bud here first: in a shock to maybe one person - he was not being "douchey."

I won't rehash what has already been said by others, nor what I have already responded to but I'd like to respond directly to this:

it's a shame that it seems to be attracting the same crowd that made virtual interaction so unappealing in Reddit.

It's you. You're that crowd. You came into a thread with a non-constructive, do nothing, pedantic, petty, low effort, call-it-what-you-will shit comment... got called out on it: and are trying to blame literally everyone but yourself for your poor choice rather than gracefully taking your lumps and moving on. Ironically, OP made the far more high minded choice and did something that improved the post in general. Without complaint.

This isn't reddit. You are correct. You are getting down voted because we don't want reddit here either. Be the improvement you want to see or don't let the door hit you on your way out.