this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
75 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

37843 readers
186 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I enjoyed this breakdown of Meta and Zuck's constant drive for growth and the tragic way investors eat the narrative wholesale. Enjoy!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lung@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Idk he makes some pretty wild claims along the way

  • AI is only going to become more expensive for corps with time. This has ~never been true in computing, where specialized hardware and optimizations trend costs down
  • That marketing managers are dumbass easy marks who are wasting their company money. Every half way decent marketing department measures outcomes and knows exactly how much money is generated by their activities
[–] mpblack@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

You’re right - he likes to be provocative and makes some big generalizations. Not sure about the costs of AI…would need more info on that but he seems to suggest it’s an exception to the general rule in computing.

[–] mpblack@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

An interesting McKinsey article on cost of AI. Basically it’s hard to predict, but the numbers here are staggering. And then there’s the “hidden cost” of environmental impact. All these data centers etc will add to CO2 emissions, which may worsen climate change and result in more climate disasters (drought, flooding, etc) that carry huge costs. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/technology-media-and-telecommunications/our-insights/the-cost-of-compute-a-7-trillion-dollar-race-to-scale-data-centers

[–] rishado@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

AI is not like a storage disk. if something more efficient came out tomorrow everyone would just scale up training and costs would just go up again

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

And yet they still haven't managed to get enough people to pay the subscription costs, except the guys trying to package it as a SaaS and hoping the customers don't notice they're just a fancy middleman.

They can scale up training all they want, there's a natural price point most customers won't go over. And if you're thinking about businesses paying that extra cost because they can save money on actual workers... Sure, for a few months, and then they realize what happens when they leave their super intelligent AI agents alone for a few weeks and a website changes the default layout, breaking the entire workflow, or when an important client receives an absurd automated email, or when their AI note taker and financial planning agent is incapable of answering why $20000 disappeared.