this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
133 points (99.3% liked)

RetroGaming

22492 readers
255 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It was the most ridiculous and infuriatingly hard game back then, by a margin. It almost made Ghosts and Ghouls look easy in comparison.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah. It was a stupidly hard game. With unlimited lives (ie unlimited quarters) the entire thing is only a 25 minute play through.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That was by design, actually. A lot of the old arcade games were like that.

It was to get people to either quit after a bit of playing so a new person could step in and give the machine money, or have the person who lost at the hard level put more money in.

Otherwise at just a quarter the machines become unprofitable. Just capitalism things.

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

are new arcade games better at this?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Honestly not sure. Haven’t been to an arcade in years.

I should go to one again.

[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean sure, but played my fair share off arcades back in the day and some would eat your quarters faster than others and games too difficult like this one didn’t attract much attention even if they were flashy one because we kids were broke AF.

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Hey, I never said it was a good design lol