this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
231 points (98.7% liked)

PC Gaming

10859 readers
998 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kugmo@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

On the flip-side, every game worth playing uses 2GB vram or less at 1080p.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 6 points 3 days ago

That's an absolute lie and you know it.

[–] Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works -3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Even 8GB is fine to be honest, even at high settings. People are a bit dramatic about it.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I have a game that eats 11 gb of vram on low at 1080p (I play it on windowed). It suffers from some Unreal engine shenanigans and it's also a few years old.

[–] Madbrad200@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Just like normal ram, if you have more to use then it'll get used. It doesn't mean it requires more than 8gb in order to run well.

I played all of Cyberpunk on high settings with 8gb.

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You're not wrong, but then there's games like this that need at least 6 gb (more on dx12) to run on low without it running out of memory and either crashing or not launching. This is an actual issue with this particular game.

Edit: Cyberpunk has gotten a lot better though and will run on things it has no business running on.

[–] ihatefascist@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

UE is probably the worst engine ever made, even games from 20 years ago look better than that blurry mess of an engine. I hope nobody makes any game on it anymore, most of them are also badly optimized, never understood why people like that engine.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

Same reason people still use Unity after the whole shitfest on "per install tax": large community, huge knowledge base, tutorials everywhere, professional courses that focus on it.

Kinda ironic that the Unreal Tournament games (99, 2004, 3) were all incredibly optimized.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Depends on the use case. And even at 1080p there are quite a few games that use 8gb or close to it. Ghostrunner and LOTF (2023) come to mind. Although tbf, I played the first one on my RX580 8G (I think) almost maxed out and it did fine.

But if you're buying a card now, especially at new modern card prices, you want to have at least a bit of future proofing.

[–] amorangi@lemmy.nz 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Video editing and AI require as much VRAM as you can get. Not everyone uses the cards just for gaming.

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Then don't buy the current-gen low-end card for video editing, mate. Get previous-gen with more vRAM, or go AMD.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago

I don't even have a GPU, but to be honest I don't even game anymore cuz I work more hours then there are in a day