this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
1591 points (99.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

7438 readers
3261 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

You can take this a step further and ask why we have this aggregation of wealth at all. Private wealth consolidation is a form of malinvestment resulting from a handful of individuals who are told they can effectively loot the economy unchecked.

Taxation "solves" the problem by clawing back some of that malinvestment. But if you recognize it as malinvestment from the outset, you can see arguments against having these private aggregators of wealth at all.

Instead of taxes, why not simply impose a maximum income? In baseball, you'd call it a salary cap.

[–] MoonlightFox@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Of course, but we are as a society so far away from that. It requires a bigger cultural shift than we are anywhere near. Even the thought of an inheritance tax is very unpopular.

Yes, even as a very social democratic country with a highly educated populace, we can be pretty stupid about taxes.

Also most really rich people have their wealth in assets and make their money as gains on those assets. So it does not really tax the most important people, except maybe some C-suites.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

if there was a maximum income people would still bitch and whine about those with mansions aquired through non monetary means.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps the next step is to improve our land use policy, such that one individual isn't afforded a mansion's worth of real estate.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

a farm uses more land than most small mansions though, and plenty of individuals own farms.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Farm collectivization isn't a new idea

[–] chuymatt@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago

Not as many as you would think, actually. And that is not the same thing that is being talked about.