this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
312 points (97.0% liked)

Games

37264 readers
1687 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Gift link, so it should be accessible to all.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They're still moving forward with the sequel (at least according to the article), so if I had to guess they figured they missed the boat with the expansion and want to focus on the sequel instead.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Which is fine, but I have no idea why they're just throwing everything they have in the trash. They built the whole world and just sat on it. Expansions could make them so much money to fund the next game in the short term

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was surprised given the success that they didn't even spit out something to keep people engaged with the game. Seemed like even a small content update or doc would have pulled people in.

Hopefully it just means the follow-up will be even better.

Seriously they could have done sims level DLC and people could have just kept buying. New mounts, small new areas, bits of story here and there, a new class

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

They very well could be implementing that stuff into the sequel.