this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
219 points (97.8% liked)

News

22869 readers
5401 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham has issued an emergency public health order temporarily suspending the right to carry firearms in public across Albuquerque and surrounding Bernalillo County.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's already illegal to carry a firearm and commit a crime...you wanting to make it double illegal? No this talking point is exactly that, a spot on assessment that laws like this only attack the law abiding gun owners. That's exactly what they're designed for, to create more criminals.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you really not understand the concept behind adding charges to extend sentences? It's why Trump has been indicted so many times.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is great if you assume all gun carriers are going to commit a crime with their gun.

The problem is this order can be used to attack people who are otherwise doing nothing wrong, who might be caring explicitly because they want to protect themselves from the crime wave this order is trying to address.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe the answer isn’t more guns.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer to the drug abuse epidemic isn't more drugs either. But banning drugs didn't do anything to help communities nor will banning guns.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So what accounts for the difference between the US and the rest of the developed world when it comes to gun crimes?

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Social safety nets.

Things like: Universal health care, stronger worker protections, better welfare support, better maternal/paternal assistance.

People making enough money to support themselves, aren't in constant danger of layoffs just to boost profits, can access physical and mental healthcare cheaply, aren't financially ruined because they have a baby and new a few months off work, and aren't in danger of losing everything over an emergency room visit aren't out committing violent crimes.

Focusing on "gun" violence ignores the root cause of violent crimes regardless of the weapon of choice.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every other country has problems too.

That’s just pointing to another problem and hoping people get distracted by it and not pay attention to the guns.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say those were problems to distract from gun violence. I said those things are a solution to violence more broadly. And as a bonus, those social nets help everyone while not violating this country's fundamental rights.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that fundamental right has already been violated, there’s plenty of places you can’t bring guns and plenty of people who can’t own them.

Every country has problems, the states are not unique that way. But they are unique among developed countries with their gun crimes.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And I've pointed to strong solutions to help being us in line with other nations. Adding more violations to our constitutional rights is not something I support.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guns, surprisingly enough, are a major contributing factor to gun problems.

You can’t look at gun crime problems but dismiss any conversation about the guns themselves.

[–] sudo22@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't dismissed any suggestions in this conversation. "less guns" is not an actual suggestion, its a vague platitude.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You just dismissed the conversation about guns again.

[–] r_wraith@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think there are laws prohibiting the possession of certain items or substances at all? I mean, why should a law abiding citizen owning a bomb, a sample of smallpox virus or a few pounds of heroin be a problem? Crimnals will get them anyhow and if they use them, it`s already illegal. Why is driving while intoxicated illegal? Wouldn't it be sufficient if only causing an accident while drunk driving would be illegal? That would certainly be way easier and cheaper to police. Why do we have building codes? Unless the house collapses or blows up, nothing bad has happemed yet.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are...you assuming there are no gun laws out there? This is just dumb logic....there are over 20k laws on the books for guns....