this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
492 points (99.8% liked)

Canada

8951 readers
1243 users here now

What's going on Canada?

Related Communities

🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.

🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer

💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.

💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
otter@lemmy.ca
mp3@lemmy.ca
492
Carney orders review of F-35 fighter jet purchase from U.S.’s Lockheed Martin (www.ctvnews.ca)
submitted 1 day ago by HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca
82 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Prime Minister Mark Carney has asked for a review of Canada’s plan to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets.

The deal with Lockheed Martin and the U.S. government is for 88 planes at a cost of about US$85 million each.

A spokesperson for Defence Minister Bill Blair said Carney has asked Blair to look into whether the F-35 contract is the best investment for Canada, or if there are better options.

“We need to do our homework given the changing environment, and make sure that the contract in its current form is in the best interests of Canadians and the Canadian Armed Forces,” Blair’s press secretary Laurent de Casanove said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

China has shown its intent in other parts of the world with its ‘belt and road’ initiative

That intent being mutual development so other countries are less dependent on China's enemy and their economies can't be leveraged against China?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

No. Their manipulation of poorer nations where China 'lends' them the money to complete projects that primarily benefit China, leaving the nations forever in China's debt.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You're just describing the IMF's model and pretending China is doing it. When countries were unable to pay back the loans, China has refinanced or forgiven them.

Having good relations and a country that isn't dependent on the west benefits China a lot more than slightly reduced costs to transport goods to a country, that every other country also reaps when a port or railroad is built.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Here's me pretending, with data.

From trains and highways to power plants and ports, Chinese funding has helped to accelerate Africa's economic growth and bridge infrastructural gaps.

However, although these loans have accelerated growth, they also present obstacles that may impede long-term development. These obstacles take the form of debt default.

The volume of borrowing from China has generated concerns over debt sustainability in some African countries.

  • Angola .... $64.8 billion
  • South Africa .... $21.3 billion
  • Ethiopia .... $20.4 billion
  • Sudan .... $18 billion
  • Egypt .... $15 billion
  • Nigeria .... $14.5 billion
  • Zambia .... $13.5 billion
  • Democratic Republic of Congo .... $13.1 billion
  • Kenya .... $12.7 billion
  • Ghana .... $9.8 billion Source