this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
433 points (97.8% liked)

News

27230 readers
4294 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ayo Edebiri said she received "insane death threats" after Elon Musk shared a false report claiming she would replace Johnny Depp in a Pirates of the Caribbean reboot.

The rumor, posted by a right-wing account with no industry ties, was never confirmed by credible sources. Musk, who commented “Disney sucks,” amplified the hoax.

Edebiri later called Musk an idiot and a fascist for promoting fascist right-wing rhetoric.

Meanwhile, producer Jerry Bruckheimer confirmed a reboot is in development but did not confirm Depp’s involvement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Actually changing Jack Sparrow to a female would be an amazing change. Why? Because it's different.

Imagine a drunk, female Jane Sparrow sailing around having grand adventures. Throw in some cute but sexy outfits. Sign me up.

Regular reboot with some guy? Probably skipping it because it doesn't excite me. It's just a reboot.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Not judging your expectation of sexy outfits. Only saying us gays didn't get them with Depp. I don't even remember him shirtless. 🥲

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It would be lame.

Making an entirely new character would be far more different and interesting.

Making a character that's attempting to transfer over the affinity people have for an existing character while also being a new character is just gimicky, manipulative, and above all else, lame as fuck.

And it's not about the character being a woman. Gladiator II was lame because it retconned Lucius to be the son of Maximus and it was constantly being like "you like Maximus, so you should also like this dude!" Naw, the only character in that movie I liked was the new character played by Denzel. The other characters were just a weak imitation of characters from a much better movie.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Fax. Gender swapping or race swapping characters for original ones instead of creating an entirely different character is lame asf

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The franchise isn’t called Jack Sparrow. It’s called Pirates of the Caribbean, based off a theme park ride which, as far as I know, has no named characters. The main character could be any pirate.

But maybe make her name less derivative… like Judy Pigeon or something… ;)

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The theme park ride always had Jack Sparrow as the only named character, even before the movies.

[–] ochi_chernye@startrek.website 2 points 4 hours ago

I was on the ride last summer, and the only name that I remember being mentioned is Davy Jones, of mythical locker fame. They did add him to the ride in 2006, but he was created for the movie in 2003.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Well, TIL!

I was 8 when I was on it and don’t remember that

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Maybe the first movie but nearly every subsequent one is basically the jack sparrow show.

[–] SomethingBlack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This counter-troll from Disney would slightly redeem them in my eyes 😂

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I also think in the next Bond movie James should lose his mind and have to be dealt with by agent 009, Janice Stock 😆

“What? We didn’t change James Bond!”

[–] SomethingBlack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Honestly, in my mind the codenumber 007 is reserved for the most elite agents and the moniker "James Bond" is a transferable identity given to the best of the 007s.

And no corporation will ever dissuade me

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Goldeneye already had Alex Trevlyn(sp?) as 006, so there are at least 9 double-O agents. We don’t really need to do the “James Bond is a code name like Captain America” thing.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe there are (at least) 9 of these code-named agents who are assigned an identity for the duration of their employment.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe 🤷‍♂️

It just seems convoluted when we have no evidence of that, but we do have evidence of other 00 agents who seemingly use their own names.

Also, if Bond is already a code name, why use other identities? We’ve seen him do that.

[–] SomethingBlack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, Captain America doesn't own the concept of codenames.

We don't "need" to do anything in a fictional world about super spies but I think it'd make the world more interesting, and quite neatly explains why the same man has been at various levels of his career, physical fitness, skill, knowledge, and face through the decades.

I have never heard of an actual logical reason that it shouldn't canon, and you haven't provided one either

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I see your point, and I don’t have a logical reason for not wanting it that way. Him never aging is just part of the goofiness of James Bond that seems to have been forgotten in the recent movies.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This head canon is what makes me see the Mission: Impossible movies as the American version of James Bond.

I think Dead Reckoning Part 2 may be the last time Tom Cruise plays Ethan Hunt, and if we see any more M:I movies after, I think it'll be a different actor but the same name.

Similar to this JB theory.

[–] SomethingBlack@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm all for that too. I feel like secret agents who's lives are dedicated to the job are the perfect excuse to have a roster of actors play the same "character"

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

At the same time, it was inspired by a TV series where the main character and actor changed...

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Wasn't that Penelope Cruz's character, more or less?