this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
288 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

66073 readers
4613 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
288
Mozilla to DOJ: Please keep allowing Google Monopoly default engine payments, so they can keep paying us. (blog.mozilla.org)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Tea@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
73 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am tired of Firefox shitty takes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why doesn’t Mozilla just fork Chromium? Anything bad sneaks in, they rip it out. New feature? Develop it specifically without paying for the whole browser. From the user’s perspective, very little changes, but cost savings would be massive.

It would also be a good high profile tab of "bad things Chrome/Chromium is doing"

EDIT: It would also justify regulating Chromium like a monopoly, though I think that government ship has sailed.

[–] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chromium is code that Mozilla is not familiar with and has a reputation for being poorly documented.

A fully divergent fork isn't likely to make development any easier for Mozilla. And a soft fork puts them at the whims of Google's development decisions. If Mozilla needs to pivot, joining with WebKit seems the more feasible option, though that would also likely be a battle to keep a Windows port maintained.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Apple could pitch in just for the sake of sticking it to Google.

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Apple has the funds to maintain WebKit by themselves, and they wouldn't want it to be cross-platform.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

But they do have an interest in displacing Google's monopoly, kinda like how they contribute to OpenStreetMaps with Apple Maps, or how Facebook finds llama.

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago

Apple is already displacing Google's monopoly.