this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
101 points (95.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11262 readers
767 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I used to have my own place before my wife and I got married, and she had her own house too. When I moved in with her I decided to rent out my place to a friend, otherwise I'd have to still pay like $650 a month for my mortgage. I set my friends rent at $900 a month for him and a friend, with cats. I paid my mortgage and had some extra to save up in case a repair was needed. Average rent for an apartment (not a house) was 1200-1500 in the same area. My renters ended up taking better care of the house than I ever did. It was beautiful when they lived there. I ended up making about 5k to 10k extra bucks over the course of a few years and my mortgage was paid for me. Eventually they had to move out due to some issues between the two at which point I sold the house and made over six figures(net profit, not gross), off a house that cost less than $80,000 when I bought it.

See what I did there? I charged a reasonable rent and still made a totally stupid amount of money off of just one property. I wasn't a goddamn parasite who tried to bleed my tenants for everything they were worth.

People like these total shitbags. They're the reason why America's youth have no future

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

That's nice, but you shouldn't have an extra property to rent out to others when there's not enough to go around.

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Using my “friends” to pay off a personal debt while making $250/mo in profit off them. See, it’s possible to be a good landlord, everyone!

Did you share any of what you made from the sale with your “friends” who helped you pay for it and kept it in good condition for you?

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Did those friends run the risk of having to pay for a new roof or anything else that can go wrong with a house? Tell me you've never owned a house without telling me you've never owned a house

[–] thisfro@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You still take someone elses money, just less of it.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

See, when the Landlord charges reasonable rates, and actually provides services in exchange for that rent (helping update appliances to newer, having paperwork on hand for any code/inspections needed for property changes (that the landlord would ultimately benefit from,) and in general treating it as a matter of 'I have obligations' instead of 'I will do nothing but I will absolutely blame the tennants for the inevetable crumbling of the property.'

I dislike the concept at base level, but that is a someone who is trying to not be a scumbag.

[–] greenashura@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Someone who needs a place to live in and doesn't have the money or doesn't want to buy their own place. IMO, it is a fair trade as long as the landlord isn't a cunt. The reasons to why they don't have enough to buy their own place have nothing to do with a single landlord, some people don't want to take roots in a single place. If you wanna go to war with someone, go to war with companies, ban companies on owning and renting places, not people.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago

The incentive structure for landlords creates these conditions, it's not some individual failing of their moral character. Individual tyrants aren't better than corporate tyrants.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your "friend" still paid a substantial portion of your mortgage and gained nothing from it beyond being out of the rain. You used him and paint it as mutually beneficial.

[–] tankfox@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How is a stable comfortable place to live 'nothing'? If being out of the rain was all it took we'd all live in tents and this conversation would not occur. Owning a house and keeping it repaired/functional is hard and expensive. You don't do your side favors by acting like our boy kept his friend in a locked closet when we all know that isn't true.

[–] commander@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

Why do you get extra properties to rent out to others while he has to pay the rent?

The only reason why he doesn't have enough is because people like you have too much.

We're coming for you.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not going to argue with you. Shelter is not a commodity.

[–] phindex@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course it is. If it wasn’t, I wouldn’t be able to sell it, take the money and invest in something else.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are too many people like you.

[–] phindex@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m trying to help you understand. You want to insult me, and make moral arguments outside the scope of basic economics.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Oh I understand. You're the one doing the mental gymnastics to try and normalize a system that exploits basic needs as get rich quick schemes that just do happen to only be available to a select few that have the money to play. Even now calling it basic economics as if that system is inherent to existence.