this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
373 points (90.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

31755 readers
819 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A lot of people point out that it doesn't make any sense that Harry and Ron didn't like their schoolwork. Well I figured out why:

It's because the magic system is just as boring in-universe as out of universe. It doesn't make any sense in universe either. Harry and Ron realised Rowling's magic system kinda stinks way before we did, because they spent all day learning it.

If Sanderson had been writing Harry Potter, then Harry and Ron would have liked learning magic as much as Hermione did (Also, Sanderson actually DID write a book about a super-school, it's called Skyward, it's good)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I rank them 3>2>4>1>5>7(w/out epilogue)>6>7

I think the ending of the first book was planned, just clumsily executed. It’s a mystery novel - she places all of these red herrings/misdirection. The reveal that Snape was actually saying a counter course with the flying bludger incident is “cute” and goes with the muddled messages and themes she has around that character.

She knew where she wanted to get to, it’s just one of the more “Idiot Ball” driven plots of the series (along with the fifth book). Harry does stupid impulsive shit because that’s his character, and the world just has to react to it. Harry logic isn’t normal people logic, so by the end of the story we’ve kinda lost track of the plot.

It’s no Earthsea but it’s serviceable paperback detective fiction for children.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

third year was my favorite as well; it was easily the most compelling story and makes the death of Sirius that much more painful in 6

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think that's a very apt way to put it.

A service le paperback detective fiction for kids.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve had friendships end over basically that statement.

The series is pleasant to read. It’s no different than reading a Tom Clancy or John Grisham or Colleen Hoover novel, just targeted at a younger audience. The fandom culture around it was fun - especially for those of us who essentially “grew up” with Harry by being roughly the same age as him at each release.

Not every novel needs to be Pale Fire or JR.

[–] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

It is objectively poorly written and poorly constructed. That's not really up for debate. The idea that it's acceptable for small children is it's only saving grace. Any adult who likes it is blinded by nostalgia or has built a personality around it.

I "grew up" with it. I read them as they came out as I was about the age. It was known to be slop for children back then.

It's not a binary from bad to acceptable. There's A LOT of range in YA books and a lot of good ones. Rowlings issue is so fundamental it really would prevent her from writing any kind of book. She simply packed the knowledge about writing to do any amount of planning ahead. She's constantly pulling out a McGuffin and insulting the intelligence of her readers. There's no thought put into the world. The characters don't come to life. It has the sensibility of Willy Wonka and the set design by Tim Burton. Her writing is closer to a single stream of consciousness than a deliberate plot because she lacked, and probably still lacks, the literary skill or expertise to actually craft that.

Her success is entirely due to factors outside her control and is in spite of her characteristic lack of ability.

Also; Tom Clancy sucks. In fact, Tom Clancy <<< Clive Cussler- and Cussler is mediocre at best.