this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
27 points (84.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

28871 readers
1279 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is an embedded assumption in the question that he does profit in some way from it, but based on his past behavior it's a pretty safe guess.

Most of the reporting I have seen on this talks about the impact of the different tariffs, but not the "why" behind it (beyond parroting what Trump says, which is never true). I'm particularly interested in the tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. The justification about stopping fentanyl smuggling is an obvious lie. (It isn't a real problem, and tariffs have nothing to do with drug smuggling. All but the mentally handicapped can figure that out for themselves.)

Edit: Thanks for the ideas. Causing shocks to the stock market and profiting from them sounds plausible. Using tariffs directly to extort business interests sounds even more likely.

BTW, I noticed that one of the commenters somehow changed their username after posting from "ComradeShark" (or something like that) to "Sharkfucker420" after I called him "Comrade" in my reply. I suspect that Russian influence farms didn't shut down after the election. They're still sowing discord on even niche social media platforms like Lemmy. (Also, rookie mistake on the username, brosky.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

The long term goal is rebuilding US industry. We have been a finance/usury economy for a very long time and it is starting to become unsustainable. By forcing American consumers to buy American products Trump creates a greater incentive for manufacture with the goal of building a more self-sufficient economy. Think vertical integration but on a nationwide scale. Trump and the capitalists he represents don't care about drug smuggling or hurting the Canadian economy, they intend to re-industrialize and that means protectionism.

I will note that it isn't unlikely that they do want to hurt the Canadian economy specifically so that it is easier to invade at a later point (because global warming will limit American resources) but this is secondary to re-industrialization.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt that he cares about rebuilding US industry, Comrade. The idea of invading Canada sounds plausible, but it isn't necessary for a successful invasion by the US military if he were to actually order that.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml -1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It could also be the US recognizing that it needs to decrease its sphere of influence in order to strengthen it. Perhaps focusing its imperialism on the Americas as global hegemony becomes unsustainable. These are the only conclusions I can come to without giving in to conspiracy.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

The long term goal is rebuilding US industry.

I think it's more fundamental than that. Little 8 year old Donald Trump walked up and down Manhattan with his father staring up at giant oil and steel buildings and thought to himself that THAT was success. It's not really about the industry, it's about being so wildly successful that you can put up buildings like that.

We've moved well past that economy but Trump is still stuck in the early 1950s.