this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
27 points (84.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

28871 readers
1435 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There is an embedded assumption in the question that he does profit in some way from it, but based on his past behavior it's a pretty safe guess.

Most of the reporting I have seen on this talks about the impact of the different tariffs, but not the "why" behind it (beyond parroting what Trump says, which is never true). I'm particularly interested in the tariffs on Canadian goods and energy. The justification about stopping fentanyl smuggling is an obvious lie. (It isn't a real problem, and tariffs have nothing to do with drug smuggling. All but the mentally handicapped can figure that out for themselves.)

Edit: Thanks for the ideas. Causing shocks to the stock market and profiting from them sounds plausible. Using tariffs directly to extort business interests sounds even more likely.

BTW, I noticed that one of the commenters somehow changed their username after posting from "ComradeShark" (or something like that) to "Sharkfucker420" after I called him "Comrade" in my reply. I suspect that Russian influence farms didn't shut down after the election. They're still sowing discord on even niche social media platforms like Lemmy. (Also, rookie mistake on the username, brosky.)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 38 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

He doesn't. But neither does the US, which increasingly seems to be the point. He's clearly playing out a Russian objective of alienating us from our allies. Don't know if it's totally Russia, or maybe China funding behind Russia, but its very bad outcome for the US.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Let's say you were a cynical POS who didn't care about anything but enriching yourself. What if you could depress the stock market by doing a dumb thing, and get it to bounce back when you undo that dumb thing?

If you alone knew when you would undo the dumb thing, you could buy stocks low and sell them high because YOU are the one moving the market

Or he's just a Russian agent, who knows.

[–] CMLVI@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

This is what I've been sitting on for the last few days. He is trying to push us to the point that our only ally left could be Russia, by economically and politically alienating our current allies. If/when it got to that point, we'd take whatever we could get. Without us, NATO in it's current form also loses a ton of power, further making the return of the Soviet Union possible.

And yet this is like...some wild theory that can't be conceived. He's been saying for years he wants to reunify.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Yup, he does what his boss says first and foremost. Every now and then Putin let's him pocket the difference.